-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adjust Supported Python/Django Versions #3421
Adjust Supported Python/Django Versions #3421
Conversation
No longer supported
ead787b
to
366dff4
Compare
Travis is not yet supporting Python 3.5 with Tox. Half inclined to just leave it in, so it comes online when they do. |
How about a (possibly informal) policy of:
? (Which'd be in line with this PR) |
I see compat changes here - should the last checklist item also be ticked? |
I'm not finished — will tick and ping when it's ready — On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Tom Christie [email protected]
|
Gotcha |
@tomchristie If that's the decision then OK, but I still think we should drop 1.6 and then when 1.4 goes EOL we (formally) follow Django's supported versions. I worry that by supporting 1.6 we'd be saying it's OK to be using it — and it really isn't. (If people are stuck on 1.6 then the old versions of DRF will still work for them, and their priority should be on upgrading Django — not keeping up with us.) (Again, "Opinion") |
579d4e3
to
8ea97aa
Compare
8ea97aa
to
25de8c9
Compare
@tomchristie @xordoquy — This should be ready to review. I didn't Milestone it. The bit I wasn't sure about was |
Def a reasonable possibility. |
Okay great. We'll add django1.9-alpha when it comes out in a few days. |
Fixes #3408
compat.py
Thinking to stick there and look at Python 2.6 and Django 1.6 separately