-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Partial Results] Move inspector adapter integration into search source #96241
[Partial Results] Move inspector adapter integration into search source #96241
Conversation
…tor-integration-in-search-source
…tor-integration-in-search-source
Pinging @elastic/kibana-app-services (Team:AppServices) |
const response$ = await requestSearchSource.fetch$({ | ||
abortSignal, | ||
sessionId: searchSessionId, | ||
requestResponder, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think it makes sense here to pass inspectorAdapters.requests
in, as we'll need that to construct the other bucket inside searchsource as well. i'm fine with leaving it as is for now however as we plan to move the other bucket code inside searchsource in a followup pr.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree and I intend to make that change in the other bucket PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
code LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
search-embeddable changes LGTM 👍
async getSearchRequestBody() { | ||
const searchRequest = await this.flatten(); | ||
return searchRequest.body; | ||
getSearchRequestBody() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this not async any more?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
flatten was never async, this is just ceanup
@elasticmachine merge upstream |
merge conflict between base and head |
…tor-integration-in-search-source
@elasticmachine merge upstream |
💚 Build Succeeded
Metrics [docs]Module Count
Async chunks
Page load bundle
History
To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with: cc @lizozom |
…ce (elastic#96241) * Move inspector adapter integration into search source * docs and ts Co-authored-by: Kibana Machine <[email protected]>
💚 Backport successful
This backport PR will be merged automatically after passing CI. |
…ce (#96241) (#96701) * Move inspector adapter integration into search source * docs and ts Co-authored-by: Kibana Machine <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Liza Katz <[email protected]>
…to-metrics-tab * 'master' of github.com:elastic/kibana: (44 commits) [Exploratory View]Additional metrics for kpi over time (elastic#96532) [Fleet] UI changes on hosted policy detail view (elastic#96337) Stacked line charts incorrectly shows one term as 100% (elastic#96203) [Fleet] Create enrollment API keys as current user (elastic#96464) [Lens] Make table and metric show on top Chart switcher (elastic#96601) skip flaky suite (elastic#96691) [Lens] Hide "Show more errors" once expanded (elastic#96605) [Discover] Unskip histogram hiding test (elastic#95759) skip flyout test, add linked issue elastic#96708 skip copy_to_space_flyout_internal.test.tsx elastic#96708 fix config validation (elastic#96502) Document telemetry fields for stack security features (elastic#96638) [Partial Results] Move inspector adapter integration into search source (elastic#96241) [RAC] Rule registry plugin (elastic#95903) [APM] Run precommit tasks sequentially (elastic#96551) [Maps] fix Kibana does not recognize a valid geo_shape index when attempting to create a Tracking Containment alert (elastic#96633) [Security Solution] [Cases] Small UI bugfixes (elastic#96511) [Actions UI] Changed PagerDuty action form UI to fill payload fields according to the API docs for Resolve and Acknowledge events. (elastic#96363) App Search: Result Component Updates (elastic#96184) [Alerting] Preconfigured alert history index connector (elastic#94909) ...
Summary
Partially resolves #83652
Release Note
Checklist
Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR.
For maintainers