[Synthetics] Unskip Synthetics Serverless Enablement API tests #180199
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
justinkambic
added
release_note:skip
|
Pinging @elastic/obs-ux-infra_services-team (Team:obs-ux-infra_services) |
🤖 GitHub commentsExpand to view the GitHub comments
Just comment with:
|
justinkambic
force-pushed
the
180180/unskip-synthetics-serverless-enablement-api-test-suite
branch
from
2b21c62 to
7cafcb8
Compare
justinkambic
changed the title
pheyos
approved these changes
Apr 8, 2024
jennypavlova
approved these changes
Apr 8, 2024
…nt-api-test-suite
💚 Build Succeeded
Metrics [docs]
History
To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with: |
justinkambic
deleted the
180180/unskip-synthetics-serverless-enablement-api-test-suite
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fixes #180108.
Previously these tests failed against MKI. This should resolve the problem as we're no longer trying to use
system_indices_superuser, which doesn't exist in MKI environments.