Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[6.x] test: hard code esApiVersion to master #13198

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 28, 2017
Merged

Conversation

epixa
Copy link
Contributor

@epixa epixa commented Jul 28, 2017

Until elasticsearch.js actually has support for 6.x/6.0 branches, this
needs to just rely on the master apiVersion.

Also, we shouldn't change this esApiVersion in tests unless we are also
changing the value in our elasticsearch plugin proper, otherwise our
tests can accidentally use a different API version than reality.

Until elasticsearch.js actually has support for 6.x/6.0 branches, this
needs to just rely on the master apiVersion.

Also, we shouldn't change this esApiVersion in tests unless we are also
changing the value in our elasticsearch plugin proper, otherwise our
tests can accidentally use a different API version than reality.
@epixa epixa added the test label Jul 28, 2017
@epixa
Copy link
Contributor Author

epixa commented Jul 28, 2017

cc @spalger

@epixa epixa merged commit 7ee7cd7 into elastic:6.x Jul 28, 2017
@epixa epixa deleted the revertapiversion branch July 28, 2017 21:54
epixa added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2017
Until elasticsearch.js actually has support for 6.x/6.0 branches, this
needs to just rely on the master apiVersion.

Also, we shouldn't change this esApiVersion in tests unless we are also
changing the value in our elasticsearch plugin proper, otherwise our
tests can accidentally use a different API version than reality.
@epixa
Copy link
Contributor Author

epixa commented Jul 28, 2017

6.0 7ee7cd7

@epixa epixa changed the title test: hard code esApiVersion to master [6.x] test: hard code esApiVersion to master Jul 28, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant