Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resolve test issues on 9.0 branch #192624

Open
4 of 6 tasks
jbudz opened this issue Sep 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
4 of 6 tasks

Resolve test issues on 9.0 branch #192624

jbudz opened this issue Sep 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
blocker Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team v9.0.0

Comments

@jbudz
Copy link
Member

jbudz commented Sep 11, 2024

#192040

@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs-team Issues missing a team label label Sep 11, 2024
@jbudz jbudz added blocker Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team v9.0.0 labels Sep 12, 2024
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-operations (Team:Operations)

@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs-team Issues missing a team label label Sep 12, 2024
@jbudz jbudz changed the title Test skips for 9.0 branch Resolve test issues on 9.0 branch Sep 12, 2024
jbudz added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2024
Updates our base version to 9.0.0

For reviewers: there are test skips in this pull request. Please assess
whether these failures should block merging as part of your review. If
not, we will track them in
#192624.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sebastián Zaffarano <[email protected]>
szaffarano added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 13, 2024
…192842)

## Summary

Follow up of #192040 and
#192624

The issue was while installing the agent policy because the `endpoint`
package is not listed in the EPR for kibana 9+. The fix is to disable
`kibanaVersionCheck`.
afharo added a commit to afharo/kibana that referenced this issue Sep 23, 2024
kibanamachine pushed a commit to kibanamachine/kibana that referenced this issue Sep 23, 2024
kibanamachine added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 23, 2024
…location&#x60; (#193741) (#193763)

# Backport

This will backport the following commits from `main` to `8.x`:
- [[#192624] Fix archive for
&#x60;incompatible_cluster_routing_allocation&#x60;
(#193741)](#193741)

<!--- Backport version: 9.4.3 -->

### Questions ?
Please refer to the [Backport tool
documentation](https://github.com/sqren/backport)

<!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Alejandro Fernández
Haro","email":"[email protected]"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2024-09-23T17:33:47Z","message":"[#192624]
Fix archive for `incompatible_cluster_routing_allocation`
(#193741)","sha":"df2ccb6789537a5a7474cc8a1601696188551352","branchLabelMapping":{"^v9.0.0$":"main","^v8.16.0$":"8.x","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["chore","Team:Core","release_note:skip","v9.0.0","backport:prev-minor"],"title":"[#192624]
Fix archive for
`incompatible_cluster_routing_allocation`","number":193741,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/193741","mergeCommit":{"message":"[#192624]
Fix archive for `incompatible_cluster_routing_allocation`
(#193741)","sha":"df2ccb6789537a5a7474cc8a1601696188551352"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":[],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"main","label":"v9.0.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v9.0.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/193741","number":193741,"mergeCommit":{"message":"[#192624]
Fix archive for `incompatible_cluster_routing_allocation`
(#193741)","sha":"df2ccb6789537a5a7474cc8a1601696188551352"}}]}]
BACKPORT-->

Co-authored-by: Alejandro Fernández Haro <[email protected]>
afharo added a commit to afharo/kibana that referenced this issue Sep 24, 2024
afharo added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 25, 2024
kibanamachine pushed a commit to kibanamachine/kibana that referenced this issue Sep 25, 2024
kibanamachine added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 25, 2024
# Backport

This will backport the following commits from `main` to `8.x`:
- [[#192624] &#x60;multiple_es_nodes&#x60;
(#193899)](#193899)

<!--- Backport version: 9.4.3 -->

### Questions ?
Please refer to the [Backport tool
documentation](https://github.com/sqren/backport)

<!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Alejandro Fernández
Haro","email":"[email protected]"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2024-09-25T13:17:27Z","message":"[#192624]
`multiple_es_nodes`
(#193899)","sha":"66f202738aafa5c1386e1949adfb7aef0538024c","branchLabelMapping":{"^v9.0.0$":"main","^v8.16.0$":"8.x","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["chore","Team:Core","release_note:skip","v9.0.0","backport:prev-minor"],"title":"[#192624]
`multiple_es_nodes`","number":193899,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/193899","mergeCommit":{"message":"[#192624]
`multiple_es_nodes`
(#193899)","sha":"66f202738aafa5c1386e1949adfb7aef0538024c"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":[],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"main","label":"v9.0.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v9.0.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/193899","number":193899,"mergeCommit":{"message":"[#192624]
`multiple_es_nodes`
(#193899)","sha":"66f202738aafa5c1386e1949adfb7aef0538024c"}}]}]
BACKPORT-->

Co-authored-by: Alejandro Fernández Haro <[email protected]>
jen-huang added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2024
…nfig setting (#198172)

## Summary

This PR removes
`xpack.fleet.internal.registry.kibanaVersionCheckEnabled: false` from
`kibana.yml` in favor of changing the default value that Fleet
populates, so that we do not apply the Kibana version constraint to EPR
requests for >= 9.0 deployments.

Prior to this change, this setting was not applied to ESS deployments as
`kibana.yml` is overridden there.

I updated the related task in
#192624 to reflect this change.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
blocker Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team v9.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants