Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relax remote check for bwc project checkouts #28666

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2018

Conversation

hub-cap
Copy link
Contributor

@hub-cap hub-cap commented Feb 13, 2018

The remote check previously validated both the remote name and the
repository as well, meaning that if someone passed in a repository that
was not a github URL, it would fail. This meant that it was not possible
to fully test bwc out with multiple branches without first pushing to a
remote. Removing the full check allows a user to pass in the origin
remote as its remote, which is already added as a file based remote to
each bwc snapshot build. This will allow changes to be made locally
across all bwc branches, tested, and then pushed simultaneously.

The remote check previously validated both the remote name and the
repository as well, meaning that if someone passed in a repository that
was not a github URL, it would fail. This meant that it was not possible
to fully test bwc out with multiple branches without first pushing to a
remote. Removing the full check allows a user to pass in the origin
remote as its remote, which is already added as a file based remote to
each bwc snapshot build. This will allow changes to be made locally
across all bwc branches, tested, and then pushed simultaneously.
Copy link
Member

@rjernst rjernst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@hub-cap hub-cap merged commit 04fe9a9 into elastic:master Feb 13, 2018
hub-cap added a commit to hub-cap/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2018
The remote check previously validated both the remote name and the
repository as well, meaning that if someone passed in a repository that
was not a github URL, it would fail. This meant that it was not possible
to fully test bwc out with multiple branches without first pushing to a
remote. Removing the full check allows a user to pass in the origin
remote as its remote, which is already added as a file based remote to
each bwc snapshot build. This will allow changes to be made locally
across all bwc branches, tested, and then pushed simultaneously.
jasontedor added a commit to jasontedor/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2018
* master:
  Backported synced-flush PR to v5.6.8 and v6.2.2
  Move more XContent.createParser calls to non-deprecated version (elastic#28672)
  Move more XContent.createParser calls to non-deprecated version (elastic#28670)
  Build: Group archive and package distribution projects (elastic#28673)
  [DOCS] Add supported token filters
  [TEST] bump timeout in testFetchShardsSkipUnavailable to 5s
  Relax remote check for bwc project checkouts (elastic#28666)
  [TEST] Synchronize searcher list in IndexShardTests
  [TEST] packaging: function to collect debug info (elastic#28608)
  Compute declared versions in a static block
  Docs: Remove references to elasticsearch directory in plugins (elastic#28647)
  Remove snapshot conditional for bwc snapshots (elastic#28657)
  Removed redundant JSON object from Put Mapping docs (elastic#28514)
  Update threadpool.asciidoc target_response_time (elastic#28655)
@hub-cap hub-cap added the v6.2.4 label Mar 20, 2018
hub-cap added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2018
The remote check previously validated both the remote name and the
repository as well, meaning that if someone passed in a repository that
was not a github URL, it would fail. This meant that it was not possible
to fully test bwc out with multiple branches without first pushing to a
remote. Removing the full check allows a user to pass in the origin
remote as its remote, which is already added as a file based remote to
each bwc snapshot build. This will allow changes to be made locally
across all bwc branches, tested, and then pushed simultaneously.
hub-cap added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2018
The remote check previously validated both the remote name and the
repository as well, meaning that if someone passed in a repository that
was not a github URL, it would fail. This meant that it was not possible
to fully test bwc out with multiple branches without first pushing to a
remote. Removing the full check allows a user to pass in the origin
remote as its remote, which is already added as a file based remote to
each bwc snapshot build. This will allow changes to be made locally
across all bwc branches, tested, and then pushed simultaneously.
martijnvg added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2018
* es/6.x: (46 commits)
  Docs: Add note about missing mapping for doc values field (#29036)
  [DOCS] Removed 6.1.4, 6.2.2, and 6.2.3 coming tags
  Remove BytesArray and BytesReference usage from XContentFactory (#29151)
  Fix BWC issue for PreSyncedFlushResponse
  Add pluggable XContentBuilder writers and human readable writers (#29120)
  Add unreleased version 6.2.4 (#29171)
  Add unreleased version 6.1.5 (#29168)
  Add a note about using the `retry_failed` flag before accepting data loss (#29160)
  Fix typo in percolate-query.asciidoc (#29155)
  Add release notes for 6.1.4 and 6.2.3
  Require HTTP::Tiny 0.070 for release notes script
  REST high-level client: add clear cache API (#28866)
  Relax remote check for bwc project checkouts (#28666)
  Set Java 9 checkstyle to depend on checkstyle conf (#28383)
  Docs: Add example of resetting index setting (#29048)
  Plugins: Fix module name conflict check for meta plugins (#29146)
  Build: Fix meta plugin bundled plugin names (#29147)
  Build: Simplify rest spec hack configuration (#29149)
  CLI: Close subcommands in MultiCommand (#28954)
  Build: Fix meta modules to not install as plugin in tests (#29150)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants