A bug fixes #1584
A bug fixes #1584
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to various configuration files and components within the micro-ui project. Key changes include the addition of new configurations in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range comments (9)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/SummaryScreen.js (1)
Line range hint
122-138: Fix thenoCardStyleproperty type and LGTM!The new card for
CampaignBoundaryis well-integrated. However, there's a minor issue:
- The
noCardStyleproperty is set to the string "true" instead of the booleantrue.Please update the
noCardStyleproperty as follows:-noCardStyle:"true", +noCardStyle: true,Other than that, the addition of the
CampaignBoundarycomponent looks good.health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/UICustomizations.js (4)
Line range hint
88-129: Approve changes with suggestion for navigation improvementThe renaming of the key to "ACTIONS" and the implementation of a Dropdown component for user actions are good improvements. However, using
window.location.hreffor navigation in a React application is not ideal.Consider using React Router's
useNavigatehook for navigation instead ofwindow.location.href. This will provide a more React-friendly way to handle navigation and preserve the single-page application behavior. Here's an example of how you could refactor this:import { useNavigate } from 'react-router-dom'; // Inside your component const navigate = useNavigate(); // Replace window.location.href with navigate navigate(`/${window.contextPath}/employee/microplan/setup-microplan?key=${1}&preview=${true}&action=${false}µplanId=${row.id}&campaignId=${row.CampaignDetails.id}`);This change will make the navigation smoother and more consistent with React best practices.
Line range hint
130-153: Approve changes with suggestion for styling improvementThe renaming of the key to "NAME_OF_MICROPLAN" and the addition of styling to handle long microplan names are good improvements. However, the use of inline styles can make the code harder to maintain in the long run.
Consider moving the inline styles to a separate CSS file or using a CSS-in-JS solution. This will improve the maintainability of your code. Here's an example of how you could refactor this:
// In a separate CSS file or styled-component const MicroplanNameStyles = { maxWidth: "15rem", wordWrap: "break-word", whiteSpace: "normal", overflowWrap: "break-word", }; // In your component if (key === "NAME_OF_MICROPLAN") { if (value && value !== "NA") { return ( <div style={MicroplanNameStyles}> <p>{value}</p> </div> ); } else { return ( <div> <p>NA</p> </div> ); } }This change will make your styles more maintainable and easier to update across your application.
Line range hint
184-215: Approve changes with suggestion for button click handlersThe renaming of the key to "ACTIONS" and the conditional rendering of different buttons based on the microplan status are excellent improvements. The use of the
t()function for labels also ensures proper internationalization.However, the
onButtonClickhandlers for all buttons are currently empty. This suggests that the functionality for these buttons is not yet implemented.Please implement the appropriate functionality for each button:
- For the "Edit" button (DRAFT status):
onButtonClick={() => { // Implement edit functionality console.log("Edit button clicked for row:", row); }}
- For the "Start" button (EXECUTION_TO_BE_DONE status):
onButtonClick={() => { // Implement start functionality console.log("Start button clicked for row:", row); }}
- For the "Download" button (RESOURCE_ESTIMATIONS_APPROVED status):
onButtonClick={() => { // Implement download functionality console.log("Download button clicked for row:", row); }}Ensure that each button performs the appropriate action when clicked. If the functionality is to be implemented in a future task, consider adding TODO comments to indicate this.
Line range hint
216-241: Approve changes with suggestion for code organizationThe addition of the "MICROPLAN_ASSIGN" button with popup functionality is a good improvement to the user interface. The use of the
useStatehook to manage the popup state is correct and follows React best practices.To improve code organization and reusability, consider extracting the button and popup logic into a separate component. This will make the
additionalCustomizationsfunction cleaner and the new component more reusable. Here's an example of how you could refactor this:const AssignFacilityButton = ({ row }) => { const [showPopup, setShowPopup] = useState(false); return ( <> <ButtonNew className="" icon="ArrowForward" iconFill="" isSuffix label={t("MICROPLAN_ASSIGN")} onClick={() => setShowPopup(true)} options={[]} optionsKey="" size="medium" style={{}} title="" variation="secondary" /> {showPopup && <FacilityPopUp details={row} onClose={() => setShowPopup(false)} />} </> ); }; // In the additionalCustomizations function case "MICROPLAN_FACILITY_ACTION": return <AssignFacilityButton row={row} />;This refactoring will improve the readability of your code and make it easier to maintain and test the AssignFacilityButton component separately.
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/example/src/UICustomizations.js (4)
Line range hint
796-837: Improve action handling in MicroplanSearchConfigThe changes to the ACTIONS column provide more options, which is good. However, there are a few improvements we can make:
- Remove the console.log statement used for debugging.
- Use constants for action codes to improve maintainability.
- Use template literals consistently for URL construction.
- Consider extracting the repeated URL construction logic into a separate function.
Here's a suggested refactor:
const ACTION_CODES = { EDIT_SETUP: "1", VIEW_SUMMARY: "2", ACTIVITY: "3" }; const getActionUrl = (actionCode, row) => { const baseUrl = `/${window.contextPath}/employee/microplan/`; switch(actionCode) { case ACTION_CODES.EDIT_SETUP: return `${baseUrl}setup-microplan?key=1&preview=true&action=falseµplanId=${row.id}&campaignId=${row.CampaignDetails.id}`; case ACTION_CODES.VIEW_SUMMARY: return `${baseUrl}setup-microplan?key=9&preview=true&action=falseµplanId=${row.id}&campaignId=${row.CampaignDetails.id}`; case ACTION_CODES.ACTIVITY: return `${baseUrl}select-activity?microplanId=${row.id}&campaignId=${row.CampaignDetails.id}`; default: return ""; } }; // In the Dropdown component select={(e) => { const url = getActionUrl(e.code, row); if (url) window.location.href = url; }}This refactoring improves code readability and maintainability.
Line range hint
892-923: Enhance action handling in MyMicroplanSearchConfigThe status-specific actions are a good addition. However, there are some improvements we can make:
- Extract the button rendering logic into a separate function for better readability.
- Implement the onButtonClick functionality for each button.
- Consider using a switch statement for different statuses instead of nested ternary operators.
Here's a suggested refactor:
const renderActionButton = (status, t, onButtonClick) => { switch(status) { case "DRAFT": return ( <Button label={t("WBH_EDIT")} variation="secondary" icon={<EditIcon styles={{ height: "1.25rem", width: "2.5rem" }} />} type="button" className="dm-workbench-download-template-btn dm-hover" onButtonClick={onButtonClick} /> ); case "EXECUTION_TO_BE_DONE": return ( <Button label={t("START")} variation="secondary" icon={<ArrowForward styles={{ height: "1.25rem", width: "2.5rem" }} />} type="button" className="dm-workbench-download-template-btn dm-hover" onButtonClick={onButtonClick} /> ); case "RESOURCE_ESTIMATIONS_APPROVED": return ( <Button label={t("WBH_DOWNLOAD")} variation="secondary" icon={<DownloadIcon styles={{ height: "1.25rem", width: "2.5rem" }} />} type="button" className="dm-workbench-download-template-btn dm-hover" onButtonClick={onButtonClick} /> ); default: return null; } }; // In the additionalCustomizations function if (key === "ACTIONS") { return renderActionButton(row.status, t, () => { // Implement the appropriate action based on the status console.log(`Action for status: ${row.status}`); }); }This refactoring improves code readability and maintainability. Don't forget to implement the actual functionality in the onButtonClick callback.
Line range hint
1086-1104: Clarify the purpose of new configurationsSeveral new configurations have been added at the end of the file:
- MyMicroplanSearchConfigExample
- FacilityMappingConfigExample
- UserManagementConfigExample
- MyMicroplanSearchConfigPlan
- FacilityMappingConfigPlan
- UserManagementConfigPlan
These configurations currently only contain a single property (
test) with values "yes" or "no". It's unclear what purpose these serve in their current state.If these configurations are intended for future use:
- Consider adding comments explaining their purpose and how they will be used.
- If they're placeholders, consider using a more descriptive property name than "test".
If they're not needed:
- Consider removing them to keep the codebase clean.
Example of how to improve if they're intended for future use:
// Configuration for MyMicroplanSearch example. To be expanded in future sprints. MyMicroplanSearchConfigExample: { isExample: true, // Add more meaningful properties here as needed }, // Configuration for FacilityMapping example. To be expanded in future sprints. FacilityMappingConfigExample: { isExample: true, // Add more meaningful properties here as needed }, // ... (similar comments for other configurations)
Line range hint
1-1104: Overall code review summaryThe changes in this file primarily focus on enhancing the MicroplanSearchConfig and MyMicroplanSearchConfig, as well as adding new configuration placeholders. While the functional improvements are good, there are several opportunities to enhance code quality:
- In MicroplanSearchConfig, the action handling can be refactored for better maintainability.
- In MyMicroplanSearchConfig, the button rendering logic can be extracted and improved.
- The newly added configurations at the end of the file need clarification or removal if not needed.
To improve the overall architecture and maintainability of this file:
- Consider breaking down this large configuration object into smaller, more focused modules. This will make it easier to manage and update specific parts of the configuration.
- Implement a consistent pattern for defining configurations across different features.
- Use TypeScript or PropTypes to add type checking to these configurations, which can help catch errors early and improve code quality.
- Add comprehensive documentation for each configuration object, explaining its purpose and how it should be used.
These changes will make the codebase more maintainable and easier to understand for other developers working on the project.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/example/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonhealth/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonhealth/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonhealth/micro-ui/web/microplan/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonhealth/micro-ui/web/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/example/src/UICustomizations.js (7 hunks)
- health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/Response.js (2 hunks)
- health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/MicroplanSearchConfig.js (1 hunks)
- health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/MyMicroplanSearchConfig.js (1 hunks)
- health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/UICustomizations.js (4 hunks)
- health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/SummaryScreen.js (2 hunks)
- health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/UserDownload.js (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (7)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/example/src/UICustomizations.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: checkhealth/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/Response.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: checkhealth/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/MicroplanSearchConfig.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: checkhealth/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/MyMicroplanSearchConfig.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: checkhealth/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/UICustomizations.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: checkhealth/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/SummaryScreen.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: checkhealth/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/UserDownload.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: check
🪛 Biome
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/UserDownload.js
[error] 42-42: This is an unexpected use of the debugger statement.
Unsafe fix: Remove debugger statement
(lint/suspicious/noDebugger)
[error] 62-62: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
(lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)
[error] 65-65: This is an unexpected use of the debugger statement.
Unsafe fix: Remove debugger statement
(lint/suspicious/noDebugger)
[error] 63-63: This let declares a variable that is only assigned once.
'fileName' is never reassigned.
Safe fix: Use const instead.
(lint/style/useConst)
🔇 Additional comments (18)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/Response.js (2)
53-53: LGTM! Simplified prop syntax.The change from
icon={"ArrowBack"}toicon="ArrowBack"is a good simplification. It removes unnecessary curly braces while maintaining the same functionality. This aligns with common React practices for passing string props.
Line range hint
1-62: Verify alignment with PR objectives.The changes in this file are minor and don't seem to address the PR objectives mentioned earlier, such as removing a card from the summary screen or fixing file download functionality. Please ensure that these objectives are addressed in other files or clarify if the objectives have changed.
To check if the PR objectives are addressed elsewhere, you can run the following script:
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/UserDownload.js (2)
58-58: LGTM: Card type changeThe change of the Card component's type to "secondary" aligns with the PR objective of updating the card type associated with file downloads. This modification appears to be intentional and should improve the visual consistency of the component.
70-70: LGTM: Improved file name handlingThe updated file name assignment is a good improvement. It now uses
item?.additionalDetails?.fileNamewith a fallback to a formatted string based onprocessedFilestoreId. This change aligns with the PR objective of correcting the file download functionality and provides a more robust way of handling file names.health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/MicroplanSearchConfig.js (6)
76-79: LGTM: Label updated for consistencyThe change from "Name of the Microplan" to "NAME_OF_MICROPLAN" improves consistency in the UI by using uppercase for all labels.
82-84: LGTM: Label updated for consistencyThe change from "Microplan Status" to "MICROPLAN_STATUS" aligns with the uppercase label convention, enhancing UI consistency.
86-89: LGTM: Label updated for consistencyThe modification from "Campaign Disease" to "CAMPAIGN_DISEASE" maintains the uppercase label convention, contributing to a more consistent UI.
90-93: LGTM: Label updated and typo correctedThe change from "Camapaign Type" to "CAMPAIGN_TYPE" not only aligns with the uppercase label convention but also corrects the typo in "Camapaign". This improves both accuracy and consistency in the UI.
98-101: LGTM: Label updated for consistencyThe change from "Actions" to "ACTIONS" maintains the uppercase label convention, contributing to a more consistent UI.
76-101: Overall assessment: Improved consistency with one minor issueThe changes in this file generally improve UI consistency by updating labels to uppercase. However, there's a typo in the "Distribution Strategy" label that needs to be corrected. Once this is addressed, the changes will significantly enhance the overall consistency of the UI.
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/MyMicroplanSearchConfig.js (6)
76-79: LGTM: Label updated for consistencyThe change from "Name of the Microplan" to "NAME_OF_MICROPLAN" improves consistency in the UI and potentially aids in internationalization efforts.
82-84: LGTM: Label updated for consistencyThe change from "Microplan Status" to "MICROPLAN_STATUS" aligns with the uppercase convention, enhancing UI consistency.
86-89: LGTM: Label updated for consistencyThe change from "Campaign Disease" to "CAMPAIGN_DISEASE" maintains the uppercase convention, improving overall UI consistency.
90-92: LGTM: Label updated and typo correctedThe change from "Camapaign Type" to "CAMPAIGN_TYPE" not only follows the uppercase convention but also corrects the spelling of "Campaign". This improves both consistency and accuracy.
98-101: LGTM: Label updated for consistencyThe change from "Actions" to "ACTIONS" aligns with the uppercase convention, maintaining UI consistency.
76-101: Overall assessment: Improved consistency with one minor issueThe changes in this file generally improve UI consistency by converting labels to uppercase. This is beneficial for maintaining a uniform look and potentially aiding internationalization efforts. However, please address the typo in the "Distribution Strategy" label to ensure all changes are error-free.
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/SummaryScreen.js (2)
Line range hint
286-305: LGTM! Changes to card8 look good.The modifications to the card with
navigationKey: "card8"are well-implemented:
- The
noCardStyleproperty is correctly set totrue.- The component has been updated to
FormulaConfigScreen.- The
customPropsare properly passed to the new component.These changes appear to be consistent with the overall structure and purpose of the
SummaryScreencomponent.
Line range hint
1-391: Overall, the changes in SummaryScreen.js look good with minor improvements needed.The modifications to the
SummaryScreencomponent enhance its functionality by:
- Adding a new card for the
CampaignBoundarycomponent.- Updating the existing card to use the
FormulaConfigScreencomponent.These changes align well with the PR objectives, particularly addressing the removal and modification of cards in the summary screen. The only improvement needed is to fix the
noCardStyleproperty type in the new card (card9).Make sure to test these changes thoroughly to ensure they integrate well with the rest of the application and provide the expected user experience.
| @@ -1,8 +1,9 @@ | |||
| import React, { useState, Fragment } from "react"; | |||
| import { Link, useHistory, useLocation } from "react-router-dom"; | |||
| import { useTranslation } from "react-i18next"; | |||
| import { ActionBar, SubmitBar, Button, ArrowLeft, ArrowForward } from "@egovernments/digit-ui-react-components"; | |||
| import { ActionBar, SubmitBar, ArrowLeft, ArrowForward } from "@egovernments/digit-ui-react-components"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider grouping related imports.
The separation of the Button import doesn't affect functionality. However, for better code organization, consider grouping related imports from the same package.
You could combine the imports like this:
import { ActionBar, SubmitBar, ArrowLeft, ArrowForward, Button } from "@egovernments/digit-ui-react-components";Also applies to: 6-6
| @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ const UserDownload = () => { | |||
| } | |||
| }, [data]); // Only run this effect when `data` changes | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
| debugger; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove debugger statement
The debugger statement should be removed before merging this PR. Debugger statements are typically used during development and should not be present in production code. They can cause unexpected behavior in production environments and are inconsistent with best practices for production-ready code.
Apply this diff to remove the debugger statement:
- debugger;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| debugger; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 42-42: This is an unexpected use of the debugger statement.
Unsafe fix: Remove debugger statement
(lint/suspicious/noDebugger)
| console.log(typeof String(fileName)) | ||
| debugger; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove debugging code
The added console.log and debugger statements should be removed before merging this PR. These statements are typically used during development and should not be present in production code. They can cause unexpected behavior and potentially expose sensitive information in production environments.
Apply this diff to remove the debugging code:
- console.log(typeof String(fileName))
- debugger;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| console.log(typeof String(fileName)) | |
| debugger; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 65-65: This is an unexpected use of the debugger statement.
Unsafe fix: Remove debugger statement
(lint/suspicious/noDebugger)
| label:"DISTIRBUTION_STRATEGY", | ||
| jsonPath:"additionalDetails.resourceDistributionStrategyCode" | ||
| }, | ||
| { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo in the "Distribution Strategy" label
While updating the label to uppercase is consistent with other changes, there's a typo in the new label. "DISTIRBUTION_STRATEGY" should be "DISTRIBUTION_STRATEGY".
Please apply this correction:
- label:"DISTIRBUTION_STRATEGY",
+ label:"DISTRIBUTION_STRATEGY",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| label:"DISTIRBUTION_STRATEGY", | |
| jsonPath:"additionalDetails.resourceDistributionStrategyCode" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| label:"DISTRIBUTION_STRATEGY", | |
| jsonPath:"additionalDetails.resourceDistributionStrategyCode" | |
| }, | |
| { |
| label:"DISTIRBUTION_STRATEGY", | ||
| jsonPath:"additionalDetails.resourceDistributionStrategyCode" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo in label
While updating the label to uppercase is consistent with other changes, there's a typo in the new label. "DISTIRBUTION_STRATEGY" should be "DISTRIBUTION_STRATEGY".
Please apply this correction:
- label:"DISTIRBUTION_STRATEGY",
+ label:"DISTRIBUTION_STRATEGY",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| label:"DISTIRBUTION_STRATEGY", | |
| jsonPath:"additionalDetails.resourceDistributionStrategyCode" | |
| }, | |
| label:"DISTRIBUTION_STRATEGY", | |
| jsonPath:"additionalDetails.resourceDistributionStrategyCode" | |
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/UserDownload.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/UserDownload.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: check
🪛 Biome
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/UserDownload.js
[error] 62-62: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
(lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)
[error] 63-63: This let declares a variable that is only assigned once.
'fileName' is never reassigned.
Safe fix: Use const instead.
(lint/style/useConst)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/UserDownload.js (1)
58-58: LGTM: Card type updated as intendedThe change of the
Cardcomponent'stypeprop to "secondary" aligns with the PR objective of modifying the card type associated with file downloads. This update is appropriate and should enhance the visual consistency of the component.
| @@ -55,20 +55,23 @@ const UserDownload = () => { | |||
| <div> | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
| <Card> | |||
| <Card type="secondary" > | |||
| <HeaderComp title="DOWNLOAD_USER_DATA" styles={{ color: "black" }} /> | |||
| <TextBlock body="DOWNLOAD_DESC" /> | |||
| {data?.ResourceDetails && | |||
| [...data?.ResourceDetails].reverse().map((item, index) => { | |||
| let fileName = item?.additionalDetails?.fileName || `FileNo${item?.processedFilestoreId?.slice(0, 4) || ''}`; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Approve file name handling with a suggestion
The update to use the fileName variable for the FileComponent's fileName prop is a good improvement. It ensures that the correct file name is displayed, enhancing the user experience.
However, there's a potential issue with the fileName variable declaration:
let fileName = item?.additionalDetails?.fileName || `FileNo${item?.processedFilestoreId?.slice(0, 4) || ''}`;To address the unsafe usage of optional chaining flagged by the static analysis tool and to make the code more robust, consider refactoring it as follows:
const fileName = item?.additionalDetails?.fileName || `FileNo${item?.processedFilestoreId ? item.processedFilestoreId.slice(0, 4) : ''}`;This change will prevent potential TypeErrors and use const instead of let as the variable is not reassigned.
Also applies to: 69-69
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 63-63: This let declares a variable that is only assigned once.
'fileName' is never reassigned.
Safe fix: Use const instead.
(lint/style/useConst)
| fileStoreId: item?.processedFilestoreId, | ||
| customName: String(fileName) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Approve download handler improvements with a suggestion
The changes to the download handler are good improvements:
- Using
item?.processedFilestoreIdinstead ofdata?.processedFilestoreIdis more appropriate in this context. - Explicit string conversion of
fileNameensures type consistency.
These modifications align with the PR objective of correcting the file download functionality and should improve its reliability.
As suggested in a previous review, consider adding a null check for item?.processedFilestoreId to further improve robustness:
- fileStoreId: item?.processedFilestoreId,
+ fileStoreId: item?.processedFilestoreId || '',This change will ensure that an empty string is used as a fallback if processedFilestoreId is null or undefined.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| fileStoreId: item?.processedFilestoreId, | |
| customName: String(fileName) | |
| fileStoreId: item?.processedFilestoreId || '', | |
| customName: String(fileName) |
Changes:
No card for componnet in summary screen
File download works properly,
Card type changed for file download
react-package version uplaoded
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
MyMicroplanSearchConfigExample,FacilityMappingConfigExample,UserManagementConfigExample, and their respective plans.SummaryScreenwith new cards.Improvements
UserDownloadcomponent for more accurate downloads.