Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

revisit types for distribution parameters #811

Closed
sbenthall opened this issue Aug 20, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #926
Closed

revisit types for distribution parameters #811

sbenthall opened this issue Aug 20, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #926
Assignees
@sbenthall
Labels
Function: Distributions
Milestone
0.11.0

Comments

@sbenthall
Copy link
Contributor

In #799, it came up that it would be better if the Distribution classes were backed consistently by np.arrays rather than (variably) lists or scalars.

The interface (does it take scalars, lists, arrays, etc.) is still debateable.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@sbenthall sbenthall

Labels
Function: Distributions
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.11.0
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

change type of internal representation of Distribution parameters to … sbenthall/HARK
1 participant
@sbenthall