Update develop-ref after #2010 and #2029 #2030
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…tead of only the filename so that the function can tell whether or not the file exists. (#1952) Co-authored-by: Julie Prestopnik <[email protected]>
* Per issue #1761 in set_perc() adding code to get FBIAS numeric value, like 1.0 or 0.9, etc. SL * Per issue #1761: in set_perc(), modified actual percentile calculation at end to use the extracted FBIAS numeric value (float). SL * Per issue #1761: modified the check on the perc_thresh_freq_bias, just has to be > 0 now. SL * Per issue #1761: cleaned up code in set_perc(). SL * Per #1761, updates to Simple_Node::set_perc() to handle variable frequency bias amounts. Changes include: - Reverting the formatting of this back to how it originally was in the develop branch. In general, just match the formatting of the existing file, so as the minimize the number of difference lines. - Add logic to adjust the percentile to be found based on the requested FBIAS value. Multiplying or dividing the percentile by the FBIAS value depends on the inequality type and whether we're bias adjusting the forecast or observation data. - Adjust the log messages slightly. Please be aware that I'm not totally confident in these changes. They warrant much more testing. This logic is very, very confusing. * Per #1761, call compute_percentile() when double-checking the percentile values. * Per #1761, remove unused variable. * Per #1761, add warning for percentiles > 100. * Per #1761. In set_perc(), after testing cleaned up code. SL * Per issue #1761: adding new config file for testing dynamic FBIAS values. SL * Per issue #1761: added new unit test for dynamic FBIAS values when running grid_stat. SL * Per issue #1761, modified FBIAS section to indicated that the user can use dynamic values that are not 1.0. SL * Update met/docs/Users_Guide/config_options.rst Co-authored-by: johnhg <[email protected]> * Update met/docs/Users_Guide/config_options.rst Co-authored-by: johnhg <[email protected]> * Update met/docs/Users_Guide/config_options.rst Co-authored-by: johnhg <[email protected]> * Update test/config/GridStatConfig_fbias_perc_thresh Co-authored-by: johnhg <[email protected]> * Update test/config/GridStatConfig_fbias_perc_thresh Co-authored-by: johnhg <[email protected]> * Update test/config/GridStatConfig_fbias_perc_thresh Co-authored-by: johnhg <[email protected]> * Update test/config/GridStatConfig_fbias_perc_thresh Co-authored-by: johnhg <[email protected]> * Per issue #1761, set nc_pairs_flag = FALSE. SL Co-authored-by: Seth Linden <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: John Halley Gotway <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: j-opatz <[email protected]>
…d output files.
…ing the logic for computing the ensemble range back to what it was previously. The new version produced very slight differences in the 6-th or 7-th decimal place when compared to previous results. There's not good reason for these changes which were caused by the order of operations in casting from doubles to floats. Reverting back to the old logic prevents diffs for anyone else downstream and is the prudent choice.
…OSS. The intel compiler does not allow adjacent >> characters when defining maps.
…elease needs to be recreated.
… required variables for MESONET
…p branch as well.
…... updating the develop branch.
Bugfix 1936 develop madis2nc
Feature 1844 python embedding
Feature 2020 run sonarqube
fesature 2015 pb2nc repeated debug messages
Co-authored-by: John Halley Gotway <[email protected]>
…cker build script
This was referenced Jan 27, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Expected Differences
PR #2010 for issue #1844 adds new tests to unit_python.xml which creates 12 new output files.
PR #2029 for issue #1546 performs a major overhaul of the automated testing for MET, enabling it to be run via GitHub actions. The many changes to the output are all expected and described in this PR comment.
Merging the develop into develop-ref should trigger GHA to recreate the truth dataset and push it up to DockerHub. Future difference testing will be performed against this update truth reference.
Do these changes introduce new tools, command line arguments, or configuration file options? [No]
If yes, please describe:
Do these changes modify the structure of existing or add new output data types (e.g. statistic line types or NetCDF variables)? [No]
If yes, please describe:
Pull Request Testing
Describe testing already performed for these changes:
Recommend testing for the reviewer(s) to perform, including the location of input datasets, and any additional instructions:
Do these changes include sufficient documentation updates, ensuring that no errors or warnings exist in the build of the documentation? [Yes or No]
Do these changes include sufficient testing updates? [Yes or No]
Will this PR result in changes to the test suite? [Yes or No]
If yes, describe the new output and/or changes to the existing output:
Please complete this pull request review by [Fill in date].
Pull Request Checklist
See the METplus Workflow for details.
Select: Reviewer(s)
Select: Organization level software support Project or Repository level development cycle Project
Select: Milestone as the version that will include these changes