Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[.NET5] Validation of experience for Visual Basic #8058

Closed
12 of 14 tasks
kvenkatrajan opened this issue Apr 11, 2022 · 11 comments
Closed
12 of 14 tasks

[.NET5] Validation of experience for Visual Basic #8058

kvenkatrajan opened this issue Apr 11, 2022 · 11 comments
Assignees
Labels
Area-VisualBasic Specific to the VB.NET language. Triage-Approved Reviewed and prioritized
Milestone

Comments

@kvenkatrajan
Copy link
Member

kvenkatrajan commented Apr 11, 2022

@kvenkatrajan kvenkatrajan changed the title #8057 [.NET5] Validation of experience for Visual Basic Apr 11, 2022
@kvenkatrajan kvenkatrajan added this to the 17.3 milestone Apr 11, 2022
@kvenkatrajan kvenkatrajan added the Triage-Approved Reviewed and prioritized label Apr 14, 2022
@ocallesp
Copy link
Contributor

ocallesp commented May 3, 2022

For the list of issues, we should only fix the ones that are in the new Project System.

cc: @kvenkatrajan

@ocallesp ocallesp self-assigned this May 3, 2022
@drewnoakes drewnoakes added the Area-VisualBasic Specific to the VB.NET language. label May 5, 2022
@drewnoakes
Copy link
Member

For the list of issues, we should only fix the ones that are in the new Project System

@ocallesp could you explain what you mean by this?

@ocallesp
Copy link
Contributor

ocallesp commented May 9, 2022

After a meeting with @melytc and @kvenkatrajan we prioritized to fix only bugs in the old project system for the old property pages.

I confirmed with @KlausLoeffelmann that there are no bugs in the property pages for .net framework vb

@KlausLoeffelmann
Copy link
Member

KlausLoeffelmann commented May 9, 2022

No, that's not correct.
There are NO bugs to my knowledge in .NET Framework, only in .NET.

[Update]: Now it's correct! 😄

@kvenkatrajan
Copy link
Member Author

After a meeting with @melytc and @kvenkatrajan we prioritized to fix only bugs in the old project system for the old property pages.

I confirmed with @KlausLoeffelmann that there are bugs in the property pages for .net framework vb

Just to confirm the expectations Osvaldo-
We would want to fix any issues identified in the legacy property pages on the legacy project system & similarly ensure that these issues cease to exist with new property pages built on top of the new project system

@KlausLoeffelmann
Copy link
Member

So, I think the confusion here is, that the WinForms Design of the "old" Project System AppDesigner is intuitively connected to Framework Apps, while the WPF-style Pages are connected to .NET.

This is NOT true for VB!

Even for .NET, the old pages are based on the WinForms Project System AppDesigner. And that scenario (only .NET!) is utterly broken. Framework (with old WinForms AppDesigner) works just fine!

@kvenkatrajan
Copy link
Member Author

Yes that is correct. We are aware of that and the work to port it to the new WPF pages is being tracked and worked here in parallel with this validation effort-
#8057

@ocallesp
Copy link
Contributor

ocallesp commented May 9, 2022

It seems that we can close #6608 and #6787 since they are working correctly in .Net Framework for VB. (No issues in the Old Project System Old Property Pages WinForms)

@ocallesp
Copy link
Contributor

ocallesp commented May 19, 2022

From this list only #3040 and AB#1517428 should be fixed.

AB#1517428 has higher priority than #3040

cc: @kvenkatrajan @melytc

@ocallesp
Copy link
Contributor

ocallesp commented May 24, 2022

AB#1517428 fixed with this pr.

@ocallesp
Copy link
Contributor

The only pending work is #3040

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area-VisualBasic Specific to the VB.NET language. Triage-Approved Reviewed and prioritized
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants