Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix ID of custom dbal types #267

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2020

Conversation

JustBlackBird
Copy link
Contributor

@JustBlackBird JustBlackBird commented Aug 11, 2017

This PR is a fix for #254

Not sure if I didn't break anything but the tests are passing 😄

@JustBlackBird
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased

tests/bootstrap.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@JustBlackBird
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Majkl578 I've moved type initialization to setUpBeforeClass. CI check is failed because it's unable to setup mongodb for php7.2 not because of the PR.

@JustBlackBird
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is there anything else I should fix to get the PR merged?

@kisprof
Copy link

kisprof commented Jun 27, 2018

Hi there!

Whats the status of this PR? I just run into the same issue as in #254 and i was glad to see there is already a PR for it. Can i help in any way to speed up the merging process?

@JustBlackBird
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Majkl578 ping

@JustBlackBird
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Ocramius @Majkl578
Is there anything I should fix to get the PR finally merged?

@JustBlackBird
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've rebased changes to fix merge conflict.

@JustBlackBird

This comment has been minimized.

@alcaeus

This comment has been minimized.

@greg0ire

This comment has been minimized.

@JustBlackBird

This comment has been minimized.

@greg0ire

This comment has been minimized.

@greg0ire greg0ire closed this Jan 4, 2020
@greg0ire greg0ire reopened this Jan 4, 2020
@greg0ire
Copy link
Member

greg0ire commented Jan 4, 2020

#333 is not merged up in master yet, hence why the build is not fixed. Are you sure you should target master though? Is there a BC-break in your PR?

EDIT: I don't think so, let me retarget this PR for you .

@greg0ire greg0ire changed the base branch from master to 1.4.x January 4, 2020 15:41
@greg0ire greg0ire closed this Jan 4, 2020
@greg0ire greg0ire reopened this Jan 4, 2020
@greg0ire

This comment has been minimized.

@JustBlackBird
Copy link
Contributor Author

JustBlackBird commented Jan 7, 2020

@greg0ire Thank you for your help with codding style

@greg0ire greg0ire requested review from a team and removed request for Majkl578 January 7, 2020 21:41
Copy link
Member

@alcaeus alcaeus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 LGTM, but I'll defer to @greg0ire for a final review.

@alcaeus alcaeus requested review from greg0ire and removed request for a team January 10, 2020 14:13
@greg0ire
Copy link
Member

I amended your commit with a message that sums up what I believe is a correct explanation for your PR. Please tell me if I got it wrong.

Copy link
Member

@greg0ire greg0ire left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I reverted your changes in src locally, and the tests failed, so that's good.
I also tried removing the implementation of Serializable from Uuid, it didn't crash, so that great too. Will merge if you are OK with the new commit message.

@JustBlackBird
Copy link
Contributor Author

JustBlackBird commented Jan 11, 2020

I amended your commit with a message that sums up what I believe is a correct explanation for your PR. Please tell me if I got it wrong.

@greg0ire The message is fine, thank you!

@greg0ire greg0ire merged commit 93d8e69 into doctrine:1.4.x Jan 11, 2020
@greg0ire
Copy link
Member

Great, thanks @JustBlackBird !

@JustBlackBird
Copy link
Contributor Author

@greg0ire thank you for getting the PR finally merged! 🎉

@greg0ire greg0ire added this to the 1.4.1 milestone Jan 13, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants