Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade docsify from 4.11.6 to 4.12.0 #1518

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2021

Conversation

anikethsaha
Copy link
Member

Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

merge advice

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • packages/docsify-server-renderer/package.json
    • packages/docsify-server-renderer/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
high severity 823/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 8.6
Cross-site Scripting (XSS)
SNYK-JS-DOCSIFY-1066017
No Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: docsify The new version differs by 124 commits.

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic

…-server-renderer/package-lock.json to reduce vulnerabilities

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-DOCSIFY-1066017
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 19, 2021

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/docsify-core/docsify-preview/n7o013jbl
✅ Preview: https://docsify-preview-git-snyk-fix-7dc1bd1d295367b894d573832d860b09.docsify-core.vercel.app

@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 1f7a458:

Sandbox Source
docsify-template Configuration

Copy link
Member

@Koooooo-7 Koooooo-7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Synx CI exception.

@sy-records
Copy link
Member

Synx CI exception.

Needs to be fixed via [email protected]

@sy-records sy-records merged commit 47cd86c into develop Feb 20, 2021
@sy-records sy-records deleted the snyk-fix-7dc1bd1d295367b894d573832d860b09 branch February 20, 2021 01:09
@sy-records sy-records mentioned this pull request Mar 5, 2021
1 task
trusktr added a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2021
* develop: (104 commits)
  chore: bump ssri from 6.0.1 to 6.0.2 (#1563)
  chore: Update Edit Document using develop branch (#1541)
  fix: Add escapeHtml for search (#1551)
  docs: link with plugin Pagination (#1554)
  fix: Upgrade dompurify from 2.2.6 to 2.2.7 (#1553)
  fix: upgrade dompurify from 2.2.6 to 2.2.7 (#1552)
  chore: bump y18n from 4.0.0 to 4.0.1 (#1548)
  chore: Fix search for missing pathNamespaces (#1547)
  fix: Upgrade docsify from 4.12.0 to 4.12.1 (#1544)
  docs:Update deploy, change Zeit to Vercel (#1540)
  fix: Cannot read property 'classList' of null (#1527)
  chore: fix microsoft/playwright-github-action error (#1534)
  Update PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
  chore: Update CHANGELOG and Update test snapshots
  chore: add changelog 4.12.1
  [build] 4.12.1
  feat: Support search when there is no title (#1519)
  test(unit): add test cases on isExternal. (#1515)
  docs: Update Vercel logo link (#1520)
  fix: Upgrade docsify from 4.11.6 to 4.12.0 (#1518)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants