Missing DOI in the paper

[lrnv]

Joss's editorialbot reports at openjournals/joss-reviews#6309

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1016/b978-0-08-051581-6.50057-x may be a valid DOI for title: Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images
- 10.2172/4390578 may be a valid DOI for title: Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines
- 10.1093/oso/9780198509936.003.0015 may be a valid DOI for title: Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications
- 10.21236/ada208388 may be a valid DOI for title: Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities
- 10.1561/9781601981851 may be a valid DOI for title: Graphical models, exponential families, and variational inference
- 10.1109/tpami.2020.2992934 may be a valid DOI for title: Normalizing flows: An introduction and review of current methods
- 10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111454 may be a valid DOI for title: Variational inference with NoFAS: Normalizing flow with adaptive surrogate for computationally expensive models
- 10.1615/int.j.uncertaintyquantification.2022043110 may be a valid DOI for title: AdaAnn: Adaptive Annealing Scheduler for Probability Density Approximation
- 10.1016/s0951-8320(02)00229-6 may be a valid DOI for title: Theorems and examples on high dimensional model representation
- 10.1016/0041-5553(67)90144-9 may be a valid DOI for title: On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals

INVALID DOIs

- None

Please check for each of them that the proposed DOI is OK, and if so add it to your bib file.

[daneschi]

Sorry this is my first review with JOSS. Should I fix these problems right away or wait until the review process is concluded? Thanks!

…

On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 3:04 AM Oskar Laverny ***@***.***> wrote: Joss's editorialbot reports: Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification): OK DOIs - None MISSING DOIs - 10.1016/b978-0-08-051581-6.50057-x may be a valid DOI for title: Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images - 10.2172/4390578 may be a valid DOI for title: Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines - 10.1093/oso/9780198509936.003.0015 may be a valid DOI for title: Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications - 10.21236/ada208388 may be a valid DOI for title: Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities - 10.1561/9781601981851 may be a valid DOI for title: Graphical models, exponential families, and variational inference - 10.1109/tpami.2020.2992934 may be a valid DOI for title: Normalizing flows: An introduction and review of current methods - 10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111454 may be a valid DOI for title: Variational inference with NoFAS: Normalizing flow with adaptive surrogate for computationally expensive models - 10.1615/int.j.uncertaintyquantification.2022043110 may be a valid DOI for title: AdaAnn: Adaptive Annealing Scheduler for Probability Density Approximation - 10.1016/s0951-8320(02)00229-6 may be a valid DOI for title: Theorems and examples on high dimensional model representation - 10.1016/0041-5553(67)90144-9 may be a valid DOI for title: On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals INVALID DOIs - None Please check for each of them that the proposed DOI is OK, and if so add it to your bib file. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#8>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADJL6ENVTBDA4IOCJJGMYYTYRNECRAVCNFSM6AAAAABCUNNTB6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGEYTCOBQGM2DCNA> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[lrnv]

There is no particular order, fix it whenever you want / can

[lrnv]

@daneschi re-reading myself I am not sure I was clear: all issues raised by the reviewers and myself are supposed to be solved before the paper gets accepted, so that we can check for completeness.

[daneschi]

Thank you for the clarification. I'll do my best to address all the comments this week. Thanks again for all your comments and suggestions!!

…

On Sun, Mar 3, 2024, 10:11 AM Oskar Laverny ***@***.***> wrote: @daneschi <https://github.com/daneschi> re-reading myself I am not sure I was clear: all issues raised by the reviewers and myself are supposed to be solved *before* the paper gets accepted. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#8 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADJL6EMEG6I2DP65EIFLNYLYWM4TXAVCNFSM6AAAAABCUNNTB6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNZVGE4TEOJWGM> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[lrnv]

Take your time, do not harsh yourself you have all the time you want :)

[daneschi]

Thanks for pointing this out! When available, the missing DOIs for the bib references where provided.