Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: correct fsGroup configuration in various deployments #974

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 3, 2024

Conversation

YrrepNoj
Copy link
Member

@YrrepNoj YrrepNoj commented Sep 3, 2024

Several (if not all 😬) of our deployments had the fsGroup configuration in the wrong place so it wasn't actually applying. This led to an issue where our data-injections were not working when the underlying store was not a PVC provisioned with local-path as the StorageClass.

This PR fixes the fsGroup key so that it is in the correct place.

@YrrepNoj YrrepNoj requested a review from a team as a code owner September 3, 2024 15:47
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Deploy Preview for leapfrogai-docs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 949460f
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/leapfrogai-docs/deploys/66d72f78b6ac500008e8b46d

@justinthelaw justinthelaw added the bug Something isn't working label Sep 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@justinthelaw justinthelaw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome! I also [will have] fixed this here. This works locally, I but am not sure if this actually helps in a CSP deployment as well (as in, I am literally not sure and haven't tried it myself yet).

Have you tested this in an EC2-based cluster using EFS yet?

Copy link
Contributor

@justinthelaw justinthelaw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Post-standup context approve!

@YrrepNoj
Copy link
Member Author

YrrepNoj commented Sep 3, 2024

Have you tested this in an EC2-based cluster using EFS yet?

Yes! We replicated and validated this fix on an RKE2 cluster (running on an EC2 instance) that was using EBS as the StorageClass.

@CollectiveUnicorn
Copy link
Contributor

These changes all make sense and I didn't see any issues when redeploying.

@YrrepNoj YrrepNoj merged commit 86766db into main Sep 3, 2024
24 of 25 checks passed
@YrrepNoj YrrepNoj deleted the 973-fix-fsgroup branch September 3, 2024 16:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
3 participants