-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix delete in the owncloud storage driver #1833
Merged
ishank011
merged 1 commit into
cs3org:master
from
C0rby:fix-delete-owncloud-storage-driver
Jun 28, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
Bugfix: Properly handle name collisions for deletes in the owncloud driver | ||
|
||
In the owncloud storage driver when we delete a file we append the deletion time to the file name. | ||
If two fast consecutive deletes happened, the deletion time would be the same and if the two files had the same name we ended up with only one file in the trashbin. | ||
|
||
https://github.com/cs3org/reva/pull/1833 |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a good improvement, so we should have it.
But IMO I can write a test where there are lots of
textfile.txt
in different folders. And I delete then all quickly. The first 2 will delete fine. Then, if the deletes happen more than once per second, there will quickly be a case where the file "exists" in the trashbin with the current Unix second, and one exists for the next Unix second, so the 3rd (or 4th and/or...) delete will fail.We have this sort of stuff in oC10 where trashbin and versions entries have uses of Unix second in the back-end implementation. And that means there are timing issues when multiple deletes, versions,... happen in the same second. And these things can happen, specially when a sync-client "wakes up" and has a backlog of things to do, or if some automated data-producer is doing "lots of stuff fast".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I completely agree but I am kind of hesitant to spend too much time on the owncloud storage driver since we don't really use it anywhere except for the tests and I still don't know if we even intend to use it productively. Maybe we need to bring this question up again in the standup or some other discussion...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree - decisions are needed about which storage drivers are to be "long-term" and enhanced to pass "all the tests".