-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix delete in the owncloud storage driver #1833
fix delete in the owncloud storage driver #1833
Conversation
So maybe this sequence is the problem:
The 1st step puts a The 2nd step, in the back-end, first deletes Then the restore happens. I have a question about (*): when a file is deleted from a folder, I would have guessed that the file would be stored in a matching folder |
AFAIK this only happens if you delete the folder but not if you just delete a file from that folder.
Yes, it's what triggers the bug but the collision avoidance code in the owncloud driver was wrong anyways. The |
e65c2e6
to
4cab3b3
Compare
https://drone.cernbox.cern.ch/cs3org/reva/1946/17/7
That's great - those scenarios were in expected-failures - I suppose they were failing "a lot of the time" before this fix. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM - I made a comment about doing this "even better" in future.
Maybe the other storage drivers already have a better implementation?
if _, err := os.Stat(tgt); !errors.Is(err, os.ErrNotExist) { | ||
// timestamp collision, try again with higher value: | ||
dtime++ | ||
tgt = filepath.Join(rp, fmt.Sprintf("%s.d%d", filepath.Base(ip), dtime)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a good improvement, so we should have it.
But IMO I can write a test where there are lots of textfile.txt
in different folders. And I delete then all quickly. The first 2 will delete fine. Then, if the deletes happen more than once per second, there will quickly be a case where the file "exists" in the trashbin with the current Unix second, and one exists for the next Unix second, so the 3rd (or 4th and/or...) delete will fail.
We have this sort of stuff in oC10 where trashbin and versions entries have uses of Unix second in the back-end implementation. And that means there are timing issues when multiple deletes, versions,... happen in the same second. And these things can happen, specially when a sync-client "wakes up" and has a backlog of things to do, or if some automated data-producer is doing "lots of stuff fast".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I completely agree but I am kind of hesitant to spend too much time on the owncloud storage driver since we don't really use it anywhere except for the tests and I still don't know if we even intend to use it productively. Maybe we need to bring this question up again in the standup or some other discussion...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree - decisions are needed about which storage drivers are to be "long-term" and enhanced to pass "all the tests".
@ishank011 @labkode this fixes a timing issue that can cause tests results to be less-predictable. Please review. |
In the owncloud storage driver when we delete a file we append the deletion time to the file name.
If two fast consecutive deletes happened, the deletion time would be the same and if the two files had the same name we ended up with only one file in the trashbin.
Because of this issue we had inconsistently failing tests in CI.