Problem: no trace detail on insufficient balance fix is not included #1679
Conversation
mmsqe
requested review from
calvinaco and
devashishdxt
and removed request for
a team
WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1679 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 16.84% 35.27% +18.42%
===========================================
Files 72 123 +51
Lines 6161 11752 +5591
===========================================
+ Hits 1038 4145 +3107
- Misses 5000 7193 +2193
- Partials 123 414 +291 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
3-8: LGTM on changelog format, but consider adding more details about the fix.The new "Unreleased" section follows the standard format. However, the bug fix description could be more descriptive to help users understand what issue was fixed and its impact.
Consider expanding the description to include:
- What was the original issue with insufficient balance handling
- How it affected users
- What changes were made to fix it
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)go.mod(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
go.mod (2)
20-20: LGTM on cometbft version update.
The update from v0.38.13 to v0.38.15 is a minor version bump that could include relevant improvements for error tracing.
Let's verify the changelog entries between these versions:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the changelog entries between v0.38.13 and v0.38.15
# to understand the changes and potential impact.
# Test: Look for changelog entries. Expect: Changes related to error tracing or balance handling.
gh api repos/cometbft/cometbft/releases | jq -r '.[] | select(.tag_name | contains("v0.38.")) | .body'276-276: Verify changes in the ethermint fork.
The dependency is being updated to point to a specific commit in crypto-org-chain's fork of ethermint. This change appears to be related to the insufficient balance trace fix mentioned in the PR objectives.
Let's verify the changes in this specific commit:
✅ Verification successful
Verified ethermint fork update for insufficient balance tracing
The dependency update points to crypto-org-chain/ethermint@836617d which addresses a specific issue with transaction tracing. The change improves error reporting when there's insufficient balance, particularly for multi-transaction scenarios within the same block. This aligns with the PR's objective of fixing insufficient balance trace details.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the changes in the ethermint fork related to balance tracing
# Test: Look for relevant changes. Expect: Changes related to insufficient balance handling.
# Check the commit message and changes
gh api repos/crypto-org-chain/ethermint/commits/836617d21619 | jq -r '.commit.message'
# Look for changes related to balance handling
rg -p "insufficient.*balance" --type go
Length of output: 274
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the changes more thoroughly by:
# 1. Looking for balance-related error messages and traces
# 2. Checking for EVM-related balance handling code
# Search for balance-related error messages and traces
rg -p "balance.*trace|trace.*balance" --type go -A 5
# Search for balance checks in EVM-related code
rg -p "Check.*[Bb]alance|[Bb]alance.*check" --type go -A 5
# Look for any modifications to balance handling logic
rg -p "GetBalance|SubBalance|AddBalance" --type go -A 5
Length of output: 10831
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the specific commit changes in the ethermint fork
# by looking at the PR that introduced these changes
# Get the PR details from crypto-org-chain/ethermint
gh api repos/crypto-org-chain/ethermint/pulls/554 | jq -r '.body, .title'
# Look for any trace-related changes in the codebase
rg -p "trace.*error|error.*trace" --type go -A 5
# Check for any EVM state transition or execution related files
fd -e go -e sol . | grep -i "evm.*\(state\|exec\)"
Length of output: 3880
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
integration_tests/test_basic.py (1)
800-804: LGTM! Consider adding a clarifying comment.The assertion correctly reflects Ethereum's behavior where failed transactions due to insufficient balance still execute successfully (failed: false) but don't affect state. The gas consumption of 21000 is correct for standard ETH transfers.
Consider adding a comment explaining why failed transactions return
failed: false:+ # Even though the transaction fails due to insufficient balance, + # the EVM execution itself is successful (failed: false) but + # doesn't affect state assert rsp["result"] == { "failed": False, "gas": 21000, "returnValue": "", "structLogs": [], }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
integration_tests/test_basic.py(1 hunks)store/go.mod(1 hunks)versiondb/go.mod(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- versiondb/go.mod
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- store/go.mod
for more info, crypto-org-chain/ethermint#554
👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻
PR Checklist:
make)make test)go fmt)golangci-lint run)go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores