-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BA.2.38 sublineage with S:S247N, S:Y248S, S:K444N (29 seq, mainly India) #809
Comments
There's another cluster mainly from Brazil featuring S:Y248SAVD. ~40 sequences at the moment. Also #740 as well. |
@Sinickle spotted this sublineage too and we were monitoring it since. Good catch @silcn |
edited Now it has been exported to Singapore and Japan too. It shows early, but significant signs of growth advantage vs BA.5 baseline I think it is worth a fast designation to complete the picture of High trasmissible BA.2 sublineages emerged in India. @corneliusroemer @InfrPopGen @chrisruis @AngieHinrichs @thomaspeacock |
@FedeGueli In our latest sequencing run (Run 60, 89 samples), BA.2.38 number 30, BA.2 number 15, and BA.2.74,75,76 number 27 together. These 27 would have been counted as BA.2. |
Thx @karyakarte for sharing these results. @InfrPopGen @chrisruis @thomaspeacock @corneliusroemer @AngieHinrichs |
Thanks @FedeGueli most of the samples were collected between 22nd and 29th June. What you say reflects in the above-mentioned run we have BA.4 = 3, BA.5 = 1, BA.5.2 = 4, BA.5.2.1 = 1 (Confirmed by IBDC). |
thx @chrisruis for designating this. |
Thanks @silcn We've added this as BA.2.38.1 to start on the branch with G22302A (S:S247N) and A22305C (S:Y248S) |
Thanks @chrisruis BA.2.38 is the most prevalent in Maharashtra, India, it needs your attention. |
Proposal for a sublineage of BA.2.38
Earliest sequence: 2022-05-31 (India)
Countries detected: India (23 seq), US-WA (3), Denmark (2), Australia (1)
Defining mutations:
S:S247N, Y248S, K444N
nuc:G22225A
Yet another Indian lineage with recent emergence and spread to multiple continents. BA.2.38 with S:K444N was previously pointed out by @Sinickle in #746, but BA.2.38 with 444N doesn't seem to have much of an advantage over BA.2.38 without 444N which is probably why it hasn't been proposed for designation. This lineage seems to have grown quite rapidly after acquiring S:247N and S:248S, although it's too early to plot a growth advantage. That pair of mutations is in the same location as the insertions seen in BA.2.52 and #806, and BA.2 lineages with S:248 mutations have often shown a growth advantage.
Lineage is shown in yellow above. The yellow sequence near the bottom is also part of this lineage, but it's poor quality and Usher misplaces it.
https://nextstrain.org/fetch/github.com/silcn/subtreeAuspice1/raw/main/auspice/subtreeAuspice1_genome_340d_b8ee30.json?branchLabel=Spike%20mutations&c=gt-S_247&label=nuc%20mutations:G22225A
EPI_ISLs
EPI_ISL_13299674
EPI_ISL_13302198
EPI_ISL_13311009
EPI_ISL_13337549
EPI_ISL_13346711
EPI_ISL_13346714
EPI_ISL_13346715
EPI_ISL_13346784
EPI_ISL_13356325
EPI_ISL_13356332
EPI_ISL_13356357
EPI_ISL_13373040
EPI_ISL_13373193
EPI_ISL_13373294
EPI_ISL_13400946
EPI_ISL_13409381
EPI_ISL_13409409
EPI_ISL_13422074
EPI_ISL_13446517
EPI_ISL_13446519
EPI_ISL_13493456
EPI_ISL_13493525
EPI_ISL_13502379
EPI_ISL_13502531
EPI_ISL_13502533
EPI_ISL_13502539
EPI_ISL_13502541
EPI_ISL_13502542
EPI_ISL_13502551
Cov-spectrum: https://cov-spectrum.org/explore/World/AllSamples/Past6M/variants?variantQuery=BA.2*+%26+S%3A247N+%26+S%3A248S+%26+22225A&
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: