fix!: change UX in key assignment (backport #1998) #2062
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Modifies the user experience (UX) of key assignment by reverting #1732. Note that this is not a full revert of #1732 because #1732 added tests that made sense to keep here as well.
Before, when a validator tried to re-use a previously assigned consumer key that they used, we would return success and the assignment would be a no-op. With this PR, we return an error instead.
The reason for this change was that we had a validator re-assigning an old consumer key they used but because the assignment was a no-op, the old consumer key was not set. As a result, the validator was confused on why the assignment was successful but the consumer key on the consumer chain remained unchanged.
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
to the type prefix if the change is state-machine breakingCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
!
the type prefix if the change is state-machine breakingSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests
Documentation
This is an automatic backport of pull request #1998 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).