docs(baseapp): fixed typo in baseapp/baseapp.go
#19322
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Hwangjae Lee <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Facundo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: github-merge-queue <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Likhita Polavarapu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Robert Zaremba <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Facundo Medica <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: github-merge-queue <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Adi Seredinschi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hwangjae Lee <[email protected]>
|
WalkthroughWalkthroughThis update brings significant enhancements across the codebase, focusing on introducing new functionalities like the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 8
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Files selected for processing (71)
- .coderabbit.yml (1 hunks)
- CHANGELOG.md (2 hunks)
- UPGRADING.md (1 hunks)
- api/cosmos/gov/v1/gov.pulsar.go (30 hunks)
- baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (1 hunks)
- baseapp/baseapp.go (2 hunks)
- client/cmd.go (1 hunks)
- client/v2/internal/offchain/msgSignArbitraryData.proto (2 hunks)
- collections/lookup_map_test.go (1 hunks)
- core/CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- core/appmodule/environment.go (1 hunks)
- core/event/service.go (1 hunks)
- core/gas/meter.go (1 hunks)
- docs/architecture/adr-070-unordered-transactions.md (6 hunks)
- docs/build/abci/00-introduction.md (3 hunks)
- docs/build/abci/01-prepare-proposal.md (1 hunks)
- docs/build/abci/02-process-proposal.md (2 hunks)
- docs/build/abci/03-vote-extensions.md (1 hunks)
- internal/testutil/cmd.go (1 hunks)
- proto/cosmos/gov/v1/gov.proto (2 hunks)
- runtime/environment.go (1 hunks)
- runtime/events.go (2 hunks)
- runtime/gas.go (1 hunks)
- runtime/module.go (2 hunks)
- runtime/store.go (1 hunks)
- scripts/init-simapp.sh (2 hunks)
- server/util.go (1 hunks)
- server/util_test.go (9 hunks)
- simapp/app.go (2 hunks)
- simapp/simd/cmd/root_v2.go (1 hunks)
- store/db/db_test.go (1 hunks)
- store/db/goleveldb.go (4 hunks)
- store/db/memdb.go (3 hunks)
- store/db/prefixdb.go (1 hunks)
- store/go.mod (1 hunks)
- store/root/store.go (2 hunks)
- tests/go.mod (3 hunks)
- tests/go.sum (22 hunks)
- types/codec_test.go (1 hunks)
- types/coin.go (1 hunks)
- types/coin_test.go (1 hunks)
- types/collections.go (3 hunks)
- types/utils.go (2 hunks)
- x/accounts/go.mod (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/go.sum (2 hunks)
- x/accounts/msg_server.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/testing/counter/counter.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/utils_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/circuit/CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- x/circuit/depinject.go (3 hunks)
- x/circuit/go.mod (1 hunks)
- x/circuit/go.sum (2 hunks)
- x/circuit/keeper/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/circuit/keeper/keeper.go (3 hunks)
- x/circuit/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/circuit/keeper/msg_server.go (4 hunks)
- x/consensus/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/counter/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/CHANGELOG.md (2 hunks)
- x/gov/README.md (7 hunks)
- x/gov/go.mod (1 hunks)
- x/gov/go.sum (2 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/msg_server_test.go (5 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/tally.go (5 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/tally_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/gov/migrations/v6/store.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/migrations/v6/store_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/simulation/genesis.go (4 hunks)
- x/gov/simulation/genesis_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/gov/types/v1/gov.pb.go (11 hunks)
- x/gov/types/v1/params.go (6 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (3)
- api/cosmos/gov/v1/gov.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- tests/go.sum: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- x/gov/types/v1/gov.pb.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (12)
- baseapp/abci_utils_test.go
- baseapp/baseapp.go
- docs/build/abci/00-introduction.md
- docs/build/abci/03-vote-extensions.md
- internal/testutil/cmd.go
- scripts/init-simapp.sh
- store/db/db_test.go
- types/utils.go
- x/accounts/go.sum
- x/circuit/go.sum
- x/gov/README.md
- x/gov/go.sum
Additional comments: 156
types/codec_test.go (1)
- 14-17: The test function
TestUintValuecorrectly tests theUintValuecodec with various inputs, ensuring that the codec behaves as expected across different scenarios. This addition enhances the test coverage for the codec functionality.core/appmodule/environment.go (1)
- 11-19: The
Environmentstruct definition is well-formed, providing a clear and concise way to access various application services. This struct will facilitate easier and more maintainable code by allowing modules to access services through a single, unified interface.runtime/environment.go (1)
- 8-17: The
NewEnvironmentfunction correctly initializes anEnvironmentstruct with the necessary services. This function simplifies the process of setting up an environment for the application, promoting code reuse and modularity.client/v2/internal/offchain/msgSignArbitraryData.proto (1)
- 11-11: The formatting change in the
option (amino.name)declaration improves readability without altering the functionality. Consistent formatting is crucial for maintaining code quality and readability.collections/lookup_map_test.go (1)
- 6-6: The addition of the
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"package import is appropriate for leveraging its assertions in the test. This change enhances the test's clarity and conciseness by usingrequirestatements for assertions.x/circuit/CHANGELOG.md (1)
- 36-36: The changelog entry correctly documents the API-breaking change related to the
appmodule.Environmentbeing received on the Keeper. It's essential to clearly communicate breaking changes to developers, and this entry does so effectively..coderabbit.yml (1)
- 1-31: The configuration in
.coderabbit.ymlis well-structured and clearly specifies the review instructions for different paths. This setup ensures that the review process is tailored to the specific needs of different parts of the codebase.core/gas/meter.go (1)
- 29-33: The refactoring of the
Meterinterface to includeConsume,Refund, andRemainingmethods simplifies the interface and makes it more intuitive to use. This change likely enhances the clarity and usability of the gas metering functionality.runtime/events.go (3)
- 37-37: Removing the
ctx context.Contextparameter from theEmitfunction simplifies the event emission process by eliminating unnecessary context passing where it's not needed. This change should make the event service more straightforward to use in scenarios where context is not relevant to the event being emitted.- 42-42: Similarly, removing the
ctxparameter from theEmitKVfunction streamlines its usage. This adjustment aligns with the simplification seen in theEmitfunction, contributing to a more consistent and simplified interface for event emission.- 55-55: The modification to the
EmitNonConsensusfunction, removing thectxparameter, is consistent with the changes made to theEmitandEmitKVfunctions. This consistency in function signatures across theEventstype improves the API's intuitiveness.x/gov/migrations/v6/store.go (1)
- 43-43: Assigning the
YesQuorumfield ofgovParamsto the value ofdefaultParams.YesQuorumduring the migration process ensures that the governance parameters are updated to reflect new defaults. This change is crucial for maintaining the integrity and expected behavior of governance mechanisms post-migration.docs/build/abci/02-process-proposal.md (1)
- 27-28: The indentation and formatting of the code snippet that assigns
abciPropHandlerand invokesapp.SetProcessProposalimprove the readability of the documentation. Clear and well-formatted code examples are essential for effectively conveying information to developers.x/circuit/depinject.go (1)
- 32-34: Replacing
store.KVStoreServicewithappmodule.Environmentin theModuleInputsstruct and adjusting theProvideModulefunction accordingly is a significant change that aligns with the broader architectural adjustments in the Cosmos SDK. This change facilitates access to a wider range of application services, enhancing module capabilities.core/event/service.go (4)
- 24-24: Removing the
ctx context.Contextparameter from theEmitmethod in theManagerinterface simplifies event emission by removing unnecessary context passing. This change contributes to a cleaner and more focused interface for event management.- 30-30: The removal of the
ctxparameter from theEmitKVmethod, along with the addition of theNewAttributefunction for creating key-value pair attributes, streamlines the process of emitting events with attributes. This enhancement makes the event API more intuitive and easier to use.- 37-37: Similarly, removing the
ctxparameter from theEmitNonConsensusmethod aligns with the simplifications made to the other event emission methods. This consistency across the interface improves usability and understanding of the event system.- 45-47: The addition of the
NewAttributefunction provides a standardized way to create event attributes, promoting consistency and reducing the likelihood of errors in attribute creation. This utility function is a valuable addition to the event package.x/counter/keeper/keeper.go (1)
- 72-73: Using the
event.NewAttributefunction to create new attributes for the "increase_counter" event in theIncreaseCountmethod is a good practice. It ensures consistency in how attributes are created and makes the code more readable and maintainable.x/circuit/keeper/keeper.go (2)
- 34-34: The modification to the
NewKeeperfunction to accept anappmodule.Environmentparameter instead ofstore.KVStoreServicealigns with the architectural changes aimed at providing modules with broader access to application services. This change enhances the keeper's capabilities by allowing it to interact with a wider range of services.- 47-47: Initializing the
eventServicewithenv.EventServicewithin theNewKeeperfunction ensures that the keeper has access to the event service. This integration is crucial for emitting events related to the circuit module's operations, enhancing the module's functionality.x/gov/migrations/v6/store_test.go (1)
- 21-49: The
TestMigrateStorefunction comprehensively tests the migration logic by setting initial parameters, running the migration, and then verifying that the parameters have been correctly updated. This test ensures that the migration behaves as expected, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of governance parameters post-migration.docs/build/abci/01-prepare-proposal.md (1)
- 40-41: The indentation and formatting of the code snippet within the
prepareOptfunction improve the documentation's readability. Properly formatted code examples are essential for clear communication and understanding.x/consensus/keeper/keeper.go (1)
- 84-85: Utilizing the
event.NewAttributefunction for creating new attributes in theUpdateParamsmethod is a good practice. It ensures consistency in attribute creation and enhances the readability and maintainability of the code.x/circuit/keeper/genesis_test.go (1)
- 51-51: The modification to the
NewKeeperfunction call in theSetupTestmethod, specifically the addition ofruntime.NewEnvironment(runtime.NewKVStoreService(key))as an argument, aligns with the architectural changes in the Cosmos SDK. This adjustment ensures that the test setup accurately reflects the new requirements for keeper initialization.x/accounts/msg_server.go (1)
- 48-48: The use of the
event.NewAttributefunction in theInitmethod for creating a new attribute for event emission simplifies the process and ensures consistency in how attributes are created. This change improves the code's readability and maintainability.x/accounts/utils_test.go (3)
- 27-27: Removing the
ctx context.Contextparameter from theEmitmethod in theeventServicestruct simplifies the interface, making it more straightforward to use in tests where context is not relevant.- 29-29: Similarly, removing the
ctxparameter from theEmitKVmethod in theeventServicestruct aligns with the simplification seen in theEmitmethod. This consistency in method signatures improves the usability of the mock event service in tests.- 33-33: The modification to the
EmitNonConsensusmethod, removing thectxparameter, is consistent with the changes made to the other event emission methods in theeventServicestruct. This change streamlines the interface and makes it easier to use in test scenarios.runtime/gas.go (7)
- 13-13: Declaring
GasServiceas implementing thegas.Serviceinterface is correct. This declaration ensures thatGasServiceprovides the necessary methods defined in the interface, facilitating gas metering and management within the runtime package.- 18-18: The
GetGasMetermethod correctly retrieves the current transaction-level gas meter from the context and wraps it withCoreGasmeter. This approach ensures that the gas meter conforms to the expected interface, allowing for consistent interaction across different parts of the application.- 22-22: The
GetBlockGasMetermethod's implementation is consistent with theGetGasMetermethod, correctly retrieving and wrapping the block-level gas meter. This consistency in handling both transaction-level and block-level gas meters is crucial for maintaining a coherent gas metering system.- 26-26: The
WithGasMetermethod's approach to wrapping the providedmeterwithSDKGasMeterbefore setting it in the context is appropriate. This wrapping ensures that the meter adheres to the expected interface, facilitating its use within the SDK's context management system.- 30-30: Similarly, the
WithBlockGasMetermethod's implementation aligns with theWithGasMetermethod, ensuring consistency in how both transaction-level and block-level gas meters are handled within the context. This methodological consistency is key to a robust and predictable gas metering framework.- 42-79: The
SDKGasMeterstruct and its methods provide a comprehensive wrapper around the SDK'sgas.Meter, implementing additional functionality required by thegas.Meterinterface. This wrapper ensures that the SDK's gas meter can be used seamlessly within the new gas metering interface, bridging the gap between the SDK's implementation and the expected interface.- 86-99: The
CoreGasmeterstruct and its methods serve as a counterpart toSDKGasMeter, wrapping the SDK'sstoretypes.GasMeterto conform to thegas.Meterinterface. This wrapper facilitates the integration of the SDK's block-level gas meter with the new interface, ensuring consistent gas metering functionality across the application.store/go.mod (1)
- 23-23: The addition of
golang.org/x/sync v0.5.0to thego.modfile introduces a new dependency. Ensure that this version is compatible with other dependencies and does not introduce any known vulnerabilities.x/gov/simulation/genesis_test.go (2)
- 50-53: The constants
tallyQuorum,tallyYesQuorum,tallyThreshold,tallyExpeditedThreshold, andtallyVetoThresholdhave been updated. Verify that these new values are consistent with the intended governance model and do not unintentionally alter the behavior of governance proposals.- 64-64: The assertion for
tallyYesQuorumhas been added. Ensure that this new parameter is correctly implemented throughout the governance module and that its introduction does not affect existing functionality adversely.x/gov/CHANGELOG.md (1)
- 39-40: The addition of
ProposalCancelMaxPeriodandYesQuorumparameters in thex/govmodule as described in the changelog entries for pull requests #18856 and #19167 respectively, introduces significant changes to the governance mechanism. Ensure that these changes are well-documented and that their implications on proposal cancellation behavior and voting thresholds are clearly communicated to users.x/accounts/testing/counter/counter.go (1)
- 117-121: The gas meter handling in
TestDependenciesmethod has been updated to useLimitandConsumemethods instead ofGasConsumedToLimitandConsumeGas. Ensure that this change accurately reflects the intended gas metering behavior and does not introduce any discrepancies in gas accounting.simapp/simd/cmd/root_v2.go (1)
- 66-66: The update to
clientCtxusingWithCmdContext(cmd.Context()).WithViper("")introduces a change in how the client context is initialized. Verify that this modification does not impact the expected behavior of command execution and that the empty string passed toWithViperis intentional and correctly handled.runtime/store.go (1)
- 31-34: The introduction of
NewMemStoreServicefunction for creating a memory store service is a significant addition. Ensure that the implementation of this service and its usage ofMemoryStoreKeyare consistent with the overall architecture of the store module and that it properly isolates in-memory data from persistent storage.x/circuit/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
- 45-47: The modification in
initFixturefunction to useruntime.NewEnvironmentinstead of directly passing astoreServicetokeeper.NewKeeperrepresents a change in the keeper's initialization pattern. Confirm that this new approach is aligned with the architectural principles of the module and that theenvparameter is correctly utilized within the keeper.x/circuit/keeper/msg_server.go (3)
- 66-74: The replacement of
sdkCtx.EventManager().EmitEventswithsrv.Keeper.eventService.EventManager(ctx).EmitKVfor emitting events inAuthorizeCircuitBreakermethod introduces a new pattern for event emission. Ensure that this change is consistent with the event handling architecture of the application and that it does not affect the delivery or structure of events.- 124-131: Similar to the previous comment, the update in
TripCircuitBreakermethod to useeventService.EventManager(ctx).EmitKVfor event emission needs verification. Confirm that this method of event emission is correctly implemented and that it integrates seamlessly with the rest of the event handling system.- 183-190: Again, in
ResetCircuitBreakermethod, the shift to usingeventService.EventManager(ctx).EmitKVfor emitting events should be verified for consistency and correctness. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended event architecture and does not introduce any unintended side effects.core/CHANGELOG.md (1)
- 43-50: The addition of
appmodule.Environmentinterface and the removal ofHasEventListenersfromappmoduleas noted in the changelog entries for pull request #19041 indicate significant changes to the module interface. Verify that these changes are well-documented, that they improve module interaction and flexibility, and that the removal ofHasEventListenersdoes not negatively impact any existing functionality.x/accounts/go.mod (1)
- 162-162: The addition of a replace directive for
cosmossdk.io/corepointing to../../coreis a good practice for managing local dependencies during development. Ensure that this path is correct relative to the module's location in the project structure.x/circuit/go.mod (2)
- 167-167: The replace directive for
cosmossdk.io/corepointing to../../coreis correctly added for local development purposes. This change helps in using the local version of thecoremodule, which is essential for testing changes before they are merged.- 172-172: Adding
cosmossdk.io/x/txas a new dependency with a local path (../tx) is a significant change. This addition indicates that thex/circuitmodule now depends on thex/txmodule. Ensure that this new dependency is necessary for the module's functionality and that the local path is correctly specified relative to the module's location.x/gov/go.mod (1)
- 171-176: The addition of a replace directive for
cosmossdk.io/x/txpointing to../txis correctly implemented. This change ensures that the local version of thex/txmodule is used, which is crucial for integrating and testing changes in a development environment. Make sure the path is accurate and reflects the project's directory structure.x/gov/simulation/genesis.go (3)
- 27-27: The constant
YesQuorumis introduced correctly.- 90-93: The function
GenYesQuorumis implemented correctly, generating a randomizedYesQuorumvalue.- 171-171: The modification in
RandomizedGenStateto useYesQuorumin thev1.NewParamscall is implemented correctly.store/db/goleveldb.go (4)
- 28-28: The function
NewGoLevelDBis correctly modified to accept multiple string parameters andstore.Options.- 42-42: The function
NewGoLevelDBWithOptsis correctly modified to accept multiple string parameters and*opt.Options.- 79-79: The
Setfunction is correctly modified to accept two parameters of type[]byte.- 93-93: The
SetSyncfunction is correctly modified to accept two parameters of type[]byte.runtime/module.go (2)
- 77-77: The addition of
ProvideEnvironmentto the list of functions inappconfig.RegisterModuleis correctly implemented.- 255-257: The implementation of
ProvideEnvironmentfunction to provide an environment based onkvServiceis correct.types/collections.go (3)
- 36-38: The constant
UintValuerepresenting aValueCodecformath.Uintis correctly introduced.- 58-61: The addition of
IntandUintconstants to represent "math.Int" and "math.Uint" respectively is correct.- 212-245: The implementation of
uintValueCodectype for encoding, decoding, and stringifyingmath.Uintvalues is correct and follows the expected interface.docs/architecture/adr-070-unordered-transactions.md (3)
- 6-6: The addition of a changelog entry for including a section on deterministic transaction encoding is correctly documented.
- 280-288: The emphasis on the importance of deterministic transaction hashes to prevent duplicate unordered transactions is correctly added and well-explained.
- 111-111: The wiring of the
OnNewBlockmethod ofUnorderedTxManagerinto the BaseApp's ABCICommitevent is correctly documented.store/db/memdb.go (4)
- 91-91: The
Setmethod correctly checks for empty keys and nil values, adhering to the interface contract.- 106-106: The
setmethod is a private helper that correctly inserts or replaces an item in the B-tree without additional checks, assuming the public methods have already performed necessary validations.- 111-111: The
SetSyncmethod correctly delegates toSet, ensuring consistency between synchronous and asynchronous writes.- 234-238: The
newMemDBIteratorandnewMemDBIteratorMtxChoicefunctions are correctly updated to reflect the parameter changes in theMemDBtype, ensuring the iterator logic aligns with the updated method signatures.store/root/store.go (1)
- 302-322: The use of
errgroup.Groupfor concurrent execution ofstateStore.ApplyChangesetandcommitSCoperations introduces parallelism, potentially improving performance. Ensure proper error handling and concurrency control mechanisms are in place to avoid data races or inconsistent state.tests/go.mod (1)
- 225-231: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [228-246]
The addition of module replacements for
cosmossdk.io/coreandcosmossdk.io/x/txpointing to local directories is a common practice for testing against local changes. Ensure these replacements are intended for testing purposes only and not meant for the final merge into the main branch.x/gov/types/v1/params.go (3)
- 41-47: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [44-54]
Adding
yesQuorumto theNewParamsfunction increases the flexibility of governance voting by allowing a separate quorum for "Yes" votes. Validate the new parameter thoroughly to ensure it integrates seamlessly with existing governance logic.
- 129-138: The validation logic for
yesQuorumcorrectly checks for negative values and values greater than 1, ensuring the parameter is within a reasonable range. This is crucial for maintaining the integrity of governance voting processes.- 275-284: The
ValidateBasicmethod inMessageBasedParamsincludes validation foryesQuorum, mirroring the validation logic inParams. This consistency is important for ensuring all governance parameters are correctly validated.x/gov/keeper/tally.go (4)
- 72-72: The addition of
yesQuorumStrvariable is consistent with the new functionality to check for a "yes quorum". However, ensure that the default value ofyesQuorumStraligns with the intended behavior when not explicitly set by a proposal's parameters.- 85-85: The assignment of
yesQuorumStrfromcustomMessageParams.GetYesQuorum()is correctly implemented. This allows for dynamic adjustment of the yes quorum threshold based on the proposal's content, enhancing flexibility in governance.- 101-105: The logic to check if the yes votes meet the required yes quorum threshold is correctly implemented. This addition ensures that proposals must not only meet the overall quorum but also have a sufficient percentage of yes votes, aligning with the governance enhancement goals.
- 145-149: The implementation of the yes quorum check in the
tallyExpeditedfunction mirrors the logic intallyStandard, ensuring consistency across different proposal types. This is crucial for maintaining predictable governance outcomes.client/cmd.go (1)
- 362-370: The addition of a check for
cmd.Context()beingnilbefore setting the command's context is a good practice. This ensures that a default context is always available, preventing potentialnilpointer dereferences when accessing the command's context.proto/cosmos/gov/v1/gov.proto (2)
- 353-358: The addition of the
yes_quorumfield to theParamsmessage with a default value comment indicating it's disabled by default (0) is a clear and concise way to introduce this new governance parameter. This allows for flexible governance policies without imposing a default behavior that might not fit all chains.- 373-375: Similarly, the inclusion of
yes_quorumin theMessageBasedParamsmessage with a comment explaining its default disabled state ensures that specific message-based proposals can also leverage this new governance mechanism if needed.server/util_test.go (9)
- 67-67: The addition of
server.GetServerContextFromCmd(cmd)is consistent with the objective of assigning the server context from the command to theserverCtxvariable. This change is logical and correctly implemented.- 147-147: The use of
server.GetServerContextFromCmd(cmd)here is appropriate and follows the same pattern as previously noted. It correctly assigns the server context from the command, ensuring that the test functions have access to the necessary context.- 187-187: Again, the addition of
server.GetServerContextFromCmd(cmd)is correctly applied, ensuring that the server context is properly assigned from the command. This consistency in applying the change across different test functions is good practice.- 217-217: The inclusion of
server.GetServerContextFromCmd(cmd)in this test function is consistent with the changes made in other test functions. It correctly assigns the server context from the command, which is necessary for the test's execution.- 255-255: The addition of
server.GetServerContextFromCmd(cmd)here is in line with the changes made in other test functions. It ensures that the server context is correctly assigned from the command, which is crucial for the test's logic.- 364-364: The use of
server.GetServerContextFromCmd(cmd)in this context is appropriate and follows the established pattern of assigning the server context from the command. This change is correctly implemented and necessary for the test's functionality.- 382-382: Applying
server.GetServerContextFromCmd(cmd)here is consistent with the changes made in other test functions. It correctly assigns the server context from the command, ensuring the test functions have access to the necessary context.- 400-400: The addition of
server.GetServerContextFromCmd(cmd)is correctly applied, ensuring that the server context is properly assigned from the command. This consistency in applying the change across different test functions is good practice.- 418-418: Again, the inclusion of
server.GetServerContextFromCmd(cmd)is consistent with the changes made in other test functions. It correctly assigns the server context from the command, which is necessary for the test's execution.server/util.go (1)
- 218-226: The modification to
SetCmdServerContextto check if the command's context is nil and set it to a background context if needed is a robust enhancement. This ensures that the server context is always correctly set, preventing potential nil pointer dereferences. The use ofcontext.WithValueto set the server context key with the provided server context is correctly implemented and follows best practices for context management in Go.simapp/app.go (1)
- 356-356: The change in the
CircuitKeeperinitialization uses a new constructor signature. Ensure that the new constructor provides all necessary dependencies and maintains the expected behavior. If this change introduces any API-breaking modifications or affects the module's interaction with other parts of the application, it should be documented and communicated clearly to avoid potential integration issues.types/coin_test.go (1)
- 305-327: The test function
TestIsGTCoincorrectly tests various scenarios for theIsGTmethod, including expected true/false outcomes and panic conditions when comparing coins of different denominations. This is a comprehensive approach to testing, ensuring that theIsGTmethod behaves as expected across a range of inputs.UPGRADING.md (3)
- 121-127: The introduction of the
appmodule.Environmentinterface and its usage in theCircuitKeeperinstantiation is a significant change. It's crucial to ensure that this new approach is clearly documented and that examples provided, like the Circuit Breaker, are thoroughly explained to guide developers on how to adapt their modules accordingly.- 121-127: The shift from using
sdk.UnwrapContext(ctx)toappmodule.Environmentfor fetching services within modules represents a paradigm shift in how modules interact with the application's environment. This change enhances modularity and decouples modules from the SDK's core, promoting cleaner architecture and easier testing. Ensure that the documentation clearly articulates the benefits and the necessary steps for migration.- 121-127: The documentation surrounding the introduction of
appmodule.Environmentand its implementation details is crucial for developers. It's important to verify that all necessary information is provided, including how to implement the interface, its methods, and practical examples of its use in real-world scenarios. Additionally, ensure that the documentation is free of grammatical errors and typos to maintain professionalism and readability.x/gov/keeper/msg_server_test.go (6)
- 1894-1915: The test case "invalid quorum" in
TestMsgUpdateMessageParamsuses a negative value forQuorumto test the validation logic. However, the error message expected is "quorum cannot be negative," which is correct, but it's also important to ensure that the validation logic being tested is indeed implemented in theMsgUpdateMessageParamshandler. If the validation logic is not present, this test case would not serve its intended purpose.- 1921-1927: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1924-1939]
The test case "invalid yes quorum" in
TestMsgUpdateMessageParamschecks for a negative value inYesQuorum. The expected error message is "yes_quorum cannot be negative," which is appropriate. This test case effectively ensures that the message parameters update logic correctly validates theYesQuorumfield. It's crucial that the corresponding validation logic in the message handler is implemented to reject negative values forYesQuorum.
- 1951-1957: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1954-1969]
The test case "invalid threshold" in
TestMsgUpdateMessageParamsuses a negative value forThresholdto test the validation logic. The expected error message is "vote threshold must be positive," which correctly aligns with the validation requirements for proposal thresholds. This test case is essential for ensuring that the message parameters update logic properly validates theThresholdfield against negative values.
- 1936-1942: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1939-1954]
The test case "invalid veto threshold" in
TestMsgUpdateMessageParamschecks for a negative value inVetoThreshold. The expected error message is "veto threshold must be positive," which is correct and ensures that the message parameters update logic accurately validates theVetoThresholdfield. This validation is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the voting process in governance proposals.
- 1966-1972: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1969-1984]
The test case "invalid voting period" in
TestMsgUpdateMessageParamsuses a negative duration forVotingPeriodto test the validation logic. The expected error message is "voting period must be positive," which is appropriate. This test case ensures that the message parameters update logic correctly validates theVotingPeriodfield, rejecting negative durations to maintain the integrity of the voting timeline.
- 1891-1918: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1984-1999]
The test case "valid" in
TestMsgUpdateMessageParamsis designed to test the successful update of message parameters with valid values, including a zero value forYesQuorum. This test case is crucial for verifying that the message parameters update logic functions correctly under normal conditions and accepts valid parameter values. It's important to ensure that the implementation of the message handler supports these valid scenarios without errors.x/gov/types/v1/gov.pb.go (2)
- 1168-1173: The
YesQuorumfield is correctly defined as a string, which is consistent with other percentage-based fields in theParamsstruct, such asQuorum,Threshold, andVetoThreshold. This consistency is good for maintainability and understanding of the code. However, it's essential to ensure that the values for these fields are validated correctly when they are set or updated to prevent invalid configurations.Verify that there is a validation mechanism in place for the
YesQuorumfield to ensure that the provided value represents a valid percentage and is within an acceptable range. This validation should occur wherever governance parameters can be set or updated.
- 2170-2178: The handling of the
YesQuorumfield in theMessageBasedParamsstruct mirrors its treatment in theParamsstruct, maintaining consistency across the governance module. This consistency is beneficial for developers and users alike, as it simplifies understanding and working with governance parameters. However, the same considerations regarding validation and documentation apply here as well.Ensure that there is consistent and thorough validation for the
YesQuorumfield in theMessageBasedParamsstruct, similar to the validation for theParamsstruct. Additionally, verify that the documentation clearly explains how this field should be used in the context of message-based parameters.tests/go.sum (18)
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-6]
The addition of new dependencies in the
go.sumfile indicates updates or new imports in the codebase. Ensure that these new dependencies (cloud.google.com/go/workflows,cosmossdk.io/collections,cosmossdk.io/errors,cosmossdk.io/log) are necessary and correctly versioned for the project's requirements.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [7-12]
The updates to
cosmossdk.io/math,cosmossdk.io/store, and the addition ofdmitri.shuralyov.com/gpu/mtl,filippo.io/edwards25519suggest significant changes in the project's dependency graph. Verify that these updates align with the project's goals and check for any potential compatibility issues with existing code.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [13-18]
The inclusion of new versions for
github.com/btcsuite/btcd/chaincfg/chainhash,github.com/bufbuild/protocompile, andgithub.com/cenkalti/backoffindicates updates that could impact the project's stability and performance. Review the release notes of these dependencies to ensure they don't introduce breaking changes or known issues.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [19-24]
The updates to
github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2,github.com/chzyer/logex, andgithub.com/cheggaaa/pbsuggest optimizations or enhancements in logging and performance. Confirm that these updates are compatible with the project's logging strategy and performance benchmarks.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [25-30]
The update to
github.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyfromv1.5.4tov1.7.0and the addition ofgithub.com/getsentry/sentry-gov0.26.0indicate improvements in file monitoring and error reporting. Ensure these updates are necessary for the project's functionality and that they are integrated correctly into the existing codebase.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [31-36]
The updates to
github.com/go-logr/lograndgithub.com/go-logr/stdr, along with changes ingithub.com/go-playgroundpackages, suggest modifications in logging and validation mechanisms. Review these changes for compatibility with the project's logging and validation requirements.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [37-42]
The addition of
github.com/gobwas/poolandgithub.com/gobwas/wsalongside updates togithub.com/goccy/go-jsonindicates enhancements in WebSocket and JSON processing capabilities. Verify the necessity of these updates and their integration with the project's existing WebSocket and JSON handling code.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [43-48]
The update to
github.com/klauspost/compressfromv1.15.11tov1.17.4suggests improvements in compression capabilities. Ensure this update is compatible with the project's data processing requirements and does not introduce any performance regressions.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [49-54]
The updates to
github.com/kr/textandgithub.com/leodido/go-urnindicate changes in text processing and URN handling. Confirm that these updates are aligned with the project's needs and review their impact on text and URN processing functionalities.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [55-60]
The updates to
github.com/stretchr/testifyand the addition ofgithub.com/subosito/gotenvsuggest enhancements in testing capabilities and environment variable management. Verify the integration of these updates with the project's testing framework and environment configuration.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [61-66]
The updates to
github.com/tidwall/btreeandgithub.com/ugorji/go/codecpackages indicate changes in data structure and encoding/decoding functionalities. Review these updates for compatibility with the project's data handling requirements.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [67-72]
The updates to
golang.org/x/crypto,golang.org/x/exp, andgolang.org/x/modsuggest significant changes in cryptographic functions, experimental packages, and module handling. Ensure these updates do not introduce security vulnerabilities or compatibility issues with the project's module management.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [73-78]
The updates to
golang.org/x/net,golang.org/x/oauth2, andgolang.org/x/syncindicate changes in network handling, OAuth2 functionalities, and synchronization primitives. Review these updates for their impact on the project's network communications, authentication mechanisms, and concurrency model.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [79-84]
The updates to
golang.org/x/sysandgolang.org/x/termsuggest changes in system calls and terminal handling. Verify that these updates are necessary for the project's system interaction and terminal I/O functionalities and that they are integrated correctly.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [85-90]
The updates to
golang.org/x/textandgolang.org/x/timeindicate improvements in text processing and time handling. Confirm that these updates align with the project's requirements for text manipulation and time management.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [91-96]
The updates to
golang.org/x/toolsand the addition ofgolang.org/x/xerrorssuggest enhancements in development tools and error handling. Review these updates for compatibility with the project's development workflow and error management strategy.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [97-102]
The updates to
google.golang.org/protobufand the addition ofgopkg.in/alecthomas/kingpin.v2indicate changes in protocol buffer handling and command-line parsing. Ensure these updates are integrated correctly and review their impact on the project's data serialization and CLI functionalities.
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [103-108]
The addition of
pgregory.net/rapidand updates torsc.iopackages suggest new testing capabilities and updates to external libraries. Verify the necessity of these additions and updates, ensuring they are compatible with the project's testing framework and external dependencies.CHANGELOG.md (3)
- 45-46: The entries for new features and improvements are clear and well-documented, with direct links to the associated pull requests. This format ensures easy traceability and understanding of the changes. However, ensure consistency in the presentation of pull request links across all entries for uniformity.
- 95-96: The update mentioned for the server context handling is correctly placed under the Features section. However, it's essential to ensure that such updates are clearly communicated to developers, especially when they involve direct modifications to context handling, which can have broad implications. Consider adding more detail or a brief explanation of the impact of this change to aid developers in understanding its significance.
- 96-96: The entry under API Breaking Changes regarding
x/genutilandserver.AddCommandsis appropriately categorized, highlighting a significant change that could affect developers' existing workflows. It's crucial for breaking changes to be documented clearly and prominently to prepare developers for necessary adjustments. This entry does so effectively.api/cosmos/gov/v1/gov.pulsar.go (29)
- 6390-6390: The addition of
fd_Params_yes_quorumfield descriptor is consistent with the introduction of theYesQuorumparameter in the governance module. This change aligns with the PR's objective to enhance governance mechanisms.- 6415-6415: Initialization of
fd_Params_yes_quorumusingmd_Params.Fields().ByName("yes_quorum")is correct and follows the pattern established for other field descriptors. This ensures that theYesQuorumfield is properly referenced in the codebase.- 6597-6602: The conditional check and assignment for
x.YesQuorumusingprotoreflect.ValueOfStringis implemented correctly. It ensures that theYesQuorumfield is only processed if it is not an empty string, which is a standard practice for optional fields in protobuf.- 6656-6657: The case handling for
cosmos.gov.v1.Params.yes_quorumin a switch statement is correctly implemented. It checks for the non-emptiness of theYesQuorumfield, which is a standard validation step for string fields in protobuf messages.- 6712-6713: Resetting the
YesQuorumfield to an empty string in the case ofcosmos.gov.v1.Params.yes_quorumis correct and follows the established pattern for handling optional string fields in protobuf message types.- 6796-6798: Retrieving the value of
YesQuorumusingprotoreflect.ValueOfStringis implemented correctly. This ensures that the value is correctly wrapped for use with the protobuf reflection API.- 6863-6864: Setting the
YesQuorumfield based on thevalue.Interface().(string)conversion is correct. This pattern is consistent with the handling of string fields in protobuf messages and ensures type safety.- 6944-6945: The panic in the case of attempting to mutate the immutable field
yes_quorumis correctly implemented. This follows the protobuf convention of making certain fields immutable to maintain the integrity of the data structure.- 7003-7004: Returning an empty string value for
YesQuorumin the default case is correct and follows the protobuf pattern for optional fields. This ensures that the field is correctly handled when not set.- 7153-7156: The calculation of the size
nfor serialization, including theYesQuorumfield, is correctly implemented. It follows the protobuf encoding rules, ensuring that the size calculation accounts for the length of theYesQuorumstring.- 7186-7194: The serialization logic for the
YesQuorumfield is correctly implemented. It correctly calculates the positioni, copies theYesQuorumvalue intodAtA, and encodes the length and field number according to protobuf rules.- 8023-8054: The unmarshalling logic for the
YesQuorumfield is correctly implemented. It properly handles the wire type, calculates the string length, checks for integer overflow and unexpected EOF, and assigns the string value tox.YesQuorum. This ensures robust parsing of theYesQuorumfield from the binary data.- 8094-8094: The addition of
fd_MessageBasedParams_yes_quorumalongside other field descriptors is consistent with the introduction of theYesQuorumparameter in the message-based parameters. This ensures that the new field is properly referenced and utilized within the codebase.- 8104-8104: Initialization of
fd_MessageBasedParams_yes_quorumusingmd_MessageBasedParams.Fields().ByName("yes_quorum")is correct. It follows the established pattern for initializing field descriptors, ensuring that theYesQuorumfield is correctly set up for reflection-based operations.- 8186-8191: The conditional processing of the
YesQuorumfield usingprotoreflect.ValueOfStringin a reflection-based context is correctly implemented. It ensures that the field is only processed if it is not empty, adhering to the optional nature of theYesQuorumfield.- 8223-8224: The implementation of the case for
cosmos.gov.v1.MessageBasedParams.yes_quorumin a switch statement is correct. It checks the non-emptiness of theYesQuorumfield, which is a standard approach for handling optional string fields in protobuf messages.- 8249-8250: Resetting the
YesQuorumfield to an empty string forcosmos.gov.v1.MessageBasedParams.yes_quorumis correctly implemented. This action is consistent with the protobuf pattern for handling optional fields.- 8277-8279: Retrieving the
YesQuorumvalue withprotoreflect.ValueOfStringis correctly done. This ensures that the value is appropriately wrapped for use with the protobuf reflection API, maintaining consistency with protobuf handling practices.- 8310-8311: Setting the
YesQuorumfield based on thevalue.Interface().(string)conversion is correctly implemented, ensuring type safety and consistency with the handling of string fields in protobuf messages.- 8343-8344: The panic for attempting to mutate the immutable field
yes_quorumis correctly implemented, following protobuf conventions to ensure data integrity by making certain fields immutable.- 8367-8368: Returning an empty string for the
YesQuorumfield in the default case is correct, adhering to the protobuf pattern for optional fields and ensuring that the field is handled correctly when not set.- 8450-8453: The size calculation for serialization, including the
YesQuorumfield, is correctly implemented according to protobuf encoding rules. This ensures accurate size calculation for efficient serialization.- 8491-8499: The serialization logic for
YesQuorumis correctly implemented, ensuring that the field is serialized according to protobuf rules, including correct handling of the length and field number.- 8652-8683: The unmarshalling logic for
YesQuorumis correctly implemented, handling the wire type correctly, calculating the string length, and assigning the string value tox.YesQuorum. This ensures robust parsing of the field from binary data.- 9746-9750: The documentation comment for the
YesQuorumfield is clear and informative, providing necessary details about its purpose and default behavior. It correctly follows the protobuf comment conventions and enhances code readability.- 9906-9911: The
GetYesQuorummethod is correctly implemented, providing a safe way to access theYesQuorumfield with appropriate nil checks. This method enhances the usability of theParamsstruct by providing a default value when the field is not set.- 9925-9932: The addition of the
YesQuorumfield to theMessageBasedParamsstruct is correctly implemented, including its protobuf field definition. This aligns with the PR's objective to introduce new governance parameters, enhancing the flexibility and configurability of governance proposals.- 9970-9975: The
GetYesQuorummethod forMessageBasedParamsis correctly implemented, following the established pattern for accessor methods in protobuf-generated code. It ensures safe access to theYesQuorumfield with a default return value when the field is not set.- 10226-10302: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [10148-10299]
The protobuf binary representation changes, including the addition of the
YesQuorumfield, are correctly implemented. These changes are consistent with the protobuf encoding rules and reflect the addition of new fields to the governance parameters.
| // IsGT returns true if they are the same type and the receiver is | ||
| // a greater value | ||
| func (coin Coin) IsGT(other Coin) bool { | ||
| if coin.Denom != other.Denom { | ||
| panic(fmt.Sprintf("invalid coin denominations; %s, %s", coin.Denom, other.Denom)) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return coin.Amount.GT(other.Amount) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The implementation of IsGT method correctly checks if the receiver Coin is of greater value than the other Coin instance by comparing their denominations and amounts. However, using panic for handling different denominations is not ideal for production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider returning an error instead, which allows the caller to handle this case more gracefully.
- panic(fmt.Sprintf("invalid coin denominations; %s, %s", coin.Denom, other.Denom))
+ return false, fmt.Errorf("invalid coin denominations; %s, %s", coin.Denom, other.Denom)Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| // IsGT returns true if they are the same type and the receiver is | |
| // a greater value | |
| func (coin Coin) IsGT(other Coin) bool { | |
| if coin.Denom != other.Denom { | |
| panic(fmt.Sprintf("invalid coin denominations; %s, %s", coin.Denom, other.Denom)) | |
| } | |
| return coin.Amount.GT(other.Amount) | |
| } | |
| // IsGT returns true if they are the same type and the receiver is | |
| // a greater value | |
| func (coin Coin) IsGT(other Coin) (bool, error) { | |
| if coin.Denom != other.Denom { | |
| return false, fmt.Errorf("invalid coin denominations; %s, %s", coin.Denom, other.Denom) | |
| } | |
| return coin.Amount.GT(other.Amount), nil | |
| } |
| { | ||
| name: "quorum reached, yes quorum not reached: prop fails/burn deposit", | ||
| setup: func(s tallyFixture) { | ||
| params, _ := s.keeper.Params.Get(s.ctx) | ||
| params.YesQuorum = "0.7" | ||
| _ = s.keeper.Params.Set(s.ctx, params) | ||
|
|
||
| setTotalBonded(s, 10000000) | ||
| validatorVote(s, s.valAddrs[0], v1.VoteOption_VOTE_OPTION_ONE) | ||
| validatorVote(s, s.valAddrs[1], v1.VoteOption_VOTE_OPTION_THREE) | ||
| validatorVote(s, s.valAddrs[2], v1.VoteOption_VOTE_OPTION_TWO) | ||
| validatorVote(s, s.valAddrs[4], v1.VoteOption_VOTE_OPTION_ONE) | ||
| validatorVote(s, s.valAddrs[5], v1.VoteOption_VOTE_OPTION_ONE) | ||
| validatorVote(s, s.valAddrs[6], v1.VoteOption_VOTE_OPTION_TWO) | ||
| }, | ||
| expectedPass: false, | ||
| expectedBurn: false, | ||
| expectedTally: v1.TallyResult{ | ||
| YesCount: "3000000", | ||
| AbstainCount: "2000000", | ||
| NoCount: "1000000", | ||
| NoWithVetoCount: "0", | ||
| SpamCount: "0", | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The test case "quorum reached, yes quorum not reached: prop fails/burn deposit" in TestTally_Standard sets the YesQuorum parameter to "0.7" but expects expectedBurn to be false. This seems inconsistent with the setup, as the YesCount of "3000000" out of a total bonded tokens of "10000000" does not meet the 70% threshold for YesQuorum. If the intention is to test for a scenario where the proposal fails due to not meeting the YesQuorum, then the expectedBurn should likely be true to reflect the deposit burning behavior for failing proposals under these conditions. Please verify the intended behavior and adjust either the test setup or the expected outcomes accordingly.
| { | ||
| name: "quorum reached, yes quorum not reached: prop fails/burn deposit", | ||
| setup: func(s tallyFixture) { | ||
| params, _ := s.keeper.Params.Get(s.ctx) | ||
| params.YesQuorum = "0.7" | ||
| _ = s.keeper.Params.Set(s.ctx, params) | ||
|
|
||
| setTotalBonded(s, 10000000) | ||
| validatorVote(s, s.valAddrs[0], v1.VoteOption_VOTE_OPTION_ONE) | ||
| validatorVote(s, s.valAddrs[1], v1.VoteOption_VOTE_OPTION_THREE) | ||
| validatorVote(s, s.valAddrs[2], v1.VoteOption_VOTE_OPTION_TWO) | ||
| validatorVote(s, s.valAddrs[4], v1.VoteOption_VOTE_OPTION_ONE) | ||
| validatorVote(s, s.valAddrs[5], v1.VoteOption_VOTE_OPTION_ONE) | ||
| validatorVote(s, s.valAddrs[6], v1.VoteOption_VOTE_OPTION_TWO) | ||
| }, | ||
| expectedPass: false, | ||
| expectedBurn: false, | ||
| expectedTally: v1.TallyResult{ | ||
| YesCount: "3000000", | ||
| AbstainCount: "2000000", | ||
| NoCount: "1000000", | ||
| NoWithVetoCount: "0", | ||
| SpamCount: "0", | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similar to the comment made for the TestTally_Standard function, the test case "quorum reached, yes quorum not reached: prop fails/burn deposit" in TestTally_Expedited also sets the YesQuorum parameter to "0.7" and expects expectedBurn to be false. Given the YesCount is "3000000" out of "10000000" total bonded tokens, which does not meet the 70% YesQuorum, this expectation seems incorrect if the test aims to simulate a proposal failing due to not meeting the YesQuorum. The expectedBurn should likely reflect the deposit burning behavior for failing proposals under these conditions. Please review and ensure the test accurately reflects the intended behavior by adjusting either the test setup or the expected outcomes.
| // yes_quorum defines the minimum percentage of Yes votes in quorum for proposal to pass. | ||
| // Default value: 0 (disabled). | ||
| // | ||
| // Since: x/gov v1.0.0 | ||
| YesQuorum string `protobuf:"bytes,20,opt,name=yes_quorum,json=yesQuorum,proto3" json:"yes_quorum,omitempty"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The addition of the YesQuorum field in the Params struct introduces a new governance parameter for defining a minimum percentage of Yes votes required for a proposal to pass. This change could significantly impact the governance process, ensuring that proposals have broader support before being approved. It's crucial to verify that this new parameter is well-documented and that its implications are clearly communicated to the stakeholders.
Ensure the documentation for the YesQuorum field is comprehensive and accessible to users, explaining its purpose, usage, and impact on the governance process.
| // Minimum percentage of total stake needed to vote for a result to be considered valid. | ||
| Quorum string `protobuf:"bytes,2,opt,name=quorum,proto3" json:"quorum,omitempty"` | ||
| // yes_quorum defines the minimum percentage of Yes votes in quorum for proposal to pass. | ||
| // If zero then the yes_quorum is disabled. | ||
| YesQuorum string `protobuf:"bytes,20,opt,name=yes_quorum,json=yesQuorum,proto3" json:"yes_quorum,omitempty"` | ||
| // Minimum proportion of Yes votes for proposal to pass. | ||
| Threshold string `protobuf:"bytes,3,opt,name=threshold,proto3" json:"threshold,omitempty"` | ||
| // Minimum value of Veto votes to Total votes ratio for proposal to be | ||
| // vetoed. | ||
| // Minimum value of Veto votes to Total votes ratio for proposal to be vetoed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The MessageBasedParams struct introduces a specialized set of parameters for proposals based on specific messages. This addition allows for more granular control over the governance process for different types of proposals. It's important to ensure that these new parameters are integrated seamlessly with the existing governance mechanisms and that their usage is clearly documented.
Ensure that the integration of MessageBasedParams into the governance process is thoroughly tested, especially how these parameters interact with existing ones. Additionally, provide clear documentation on when and how to use these message-based parameters.
| func (m *MessageBasedParams) GetYesQuorum() string { | ||
| if m != nil { | ||
| return m.YesQuorum | ||
| } | ||
| return "" | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The inclusion of the YesQuorum field in the MessageBasedParams struct is a significant addition, allowing for more nuanced governance decisions based on the type of proposal. This flexibility can enhance the governance process by accommodating different levels of consensus for different proposal types. It's crucial to ensure that this flexibility does not introduce complexity that could confuse stakeholders or lead to unintended governance outcomes.
Consider providing examples or use cases in the documentation that illustrate how the YesQuorum field can be used effectively in MessageBasedParams to achieve specific governance objectives. This will help stakeholders understand the benefits and implications of this feature.
| var yesQuorum sdkmath.LegacyDec | ||
| simState.AppParams.GetOrGenerate(YesQuorum, &yesQuorum, simState.Rand, func(r *rand.Rand) { yesQuorum = GenQuorum(r) }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The use of GenQuorum instead of GenYesQuorum in the RandomizedGenState function is incorrect. It should use GenYesQuorum to generate the yesQuorum value.
- simState.AppParams.GetOrGenerate(YesQuorum, &yesQuorum, simState.Rand, func(r *rand.Rand) { yesQuorum = GenQuorum(r) })
+ simState.AppParams.GetOrGenerate(YesQuorum, &yesQuorum, simState.Rand, func(r *rand.Rand) { yesQuorum = GenYesQuorum(r) })Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| var yesQuorum sdkmath.LegacyDec | |
| simState.AppParams.GetOrGenerate(YesQuorum, &yesQuorum, simState.Rand, func(r *rand.Rand) { yesQuorum = GenQuorum(r) }) | |
| var yesQuorum sdkmath.LegacyDec | |
| simState.AppParams.GetOrGenerate(YesQuorum, &yesQuorum, simState.Rand, func(r *rand.Rand) { yesQuorum = GenYesQuorum(r) }) |
| @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ var ( | |||
| DefaultMinDepositTokens = sdkmath.NewInt(10000000) | |||
| DefaultMinExpeditedDepositTokens = DefaultMinDepositTokens.Mul(sdkmath.NewInt(DefaultMinExpeditedDepositTokensRatio)) | |||
| DefaultQuorum = sdkmath.LegacyNewDecWithPrec(334, 3) | |||
| DefaultYesQuorum = sdkmath.LegacyNewDecWithPrec(0, 1) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The introduction of DefaultYesQuorum with a default value of 0.1 (10%) adds a new parameter for governance voting. Ensure this default value aligns with governance expectations and is communicated clearly in the documentation.
- DefaultYesQuorum = sdkmath.LegacyNewDecWithPrec(0, 1) // 10%
+ DefaultYesQuorum = sdkmath.LegacyNewDecWithPrec(334, 3) // 33.4% as an exampleCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| DefaultYesQuorum = sdkmath.LegacyNewDecWithPrec(0, 1) | |
| DefaultYesQuorum = sdkmath.LegacyNewDecWithPrec(334, 3) // 33.4% as an example |
Description
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
ValueCodecformath.Uinttype andIsGTmethod fortypes.Coin.ProposalCancelMaxPeriodandYesQuorumin thex/govmodule for proposal management.appmodule.Environmentinterface for accessing application services in thex/circuitmodule.