Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: updates to abci documentation #19309

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 31, 2024
Merged

docs: updates to abci documentation #19309

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 31, 2024

Conversation

samricotta
Copy link
Contributor

@samricotta samricotta commented Jan 31, 2024

Description

It was requested to make these small changes for the ABCI docs, the conversation can be seen here

@adizere


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified and refined the language in the ABCI introduction to improve understanding.
    • Enhanced the explanation of the PrepareProposal process and its importance.
    • Provided detailed insights on the ProcessProposal module, including validator actions and failure scenarios.
    • Updated terminology from "ABCI++" to "ABCI2.0" in the context of vote extensions.

Co-Authored-By: Adi Seredinschi <[email protected]>
@samricotta samricotta requested a review from a team as a code owner January 31, 2024 13:46
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 31, 2024

Walkthrough

The updates focus on refining the documentation and functionality of the ABCI (Application Blockchain Interface), enhancing clarity and precision across several aspects. Changes include clearer language in the introduction, a functional tweak in proposal preparation, detailed explanation on proposal processing, and a semantic update in vote extensions. These modifications aim to improve the understanding and implementation of ABCI without altering its core logic.

Changes

File(s) Summary of Changes
docs/build/abci/00-introduction.md Clarifications and refinements in language to better describe ABCI and its methods.
docs/build/abci/01-prepare-proposal.md Modified prepareOpt function for better clarity in PrepareProposalHandler method invocation.
docs/build/abci/02-process-proposal.md Elaborated on validators' rights to accept or reject a block proposal and the subsequent process if rejected.
docs/build/abci/03-vote-extensions.md Updated the version reference from "ABCI++" to "ABCI2.0 (colloquially called ABCI++)" in the context of extending a pre-commit vote, reflecting a semantic rather than functional change.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 27d99d1 and fcd976f.
Files selected for processing (4)
  • docs/build/abci/00-introduction.md (3 hunks)
  • docs/build/abci/01-prepare-proposal.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/build/abci/02-process-proposal.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/build/abci/03-vote-extensions.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • docs/build/abci/00-introduction.md
  • docs/build/abci/02-process-proposal.md
  • docs/build/abci/03-vote-extensions.md
Additional comments: 1
docs/build/abci/01-prepare-proposal.md (1)
  • 37-44: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-41]

The documentation provides a clear explanation of the PrepareProposal phase within the Cosmos SDK's ABCI documentation. However, ensure that all technical terms and code references are accurate and up-to-date with the latest Cosmos SDK versions to maintain the documentation's reliability and usefulness for developers.

docs/build/abci/01-prepare-proposal.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@samricotta samricotta enabled auto-merge January 31, 2024 16:30
@samricotta samricotta added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 31, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit b026ab5 Jan 31, 2024
52 of 54 checks passed
@samricotta samricotta deleted the sam/adi-changes branch January 31, 2024 16:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants