Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SDK 0.25 / Gaia-9000 release checklist #2220

Closed
21 of 23 tasks
cwgoes opened this issue Sep 3, 2018 · 23 comments
Closed
21 of 23 tasks

SDK 0.25 / Gaia-9000 release checklist #2220

cwgoes opened this issue Sep 3, 2018 · 23 comments

Comments

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor

cwgoes commented Sep 3, 2018

Blocks:

Good to get in:

Necessary for GoS but not gaia-9000:

Completed:

@ValarDragon
Copy link
Contributor

I thought tx simulation was done for now. (Were unsure if it's necessary as we haven't made a decision for how accurately were doing gas at launch)

@alessio
Copy link
Contributor

alessio commented Sep 3, 2018 via email

@ValarDragon
Copy link
Contributor

ValarDragon commented Sep 3, 2018

I'd opt to leave it off for default until we make it not depend on privkey. If we enable it, we'll have to explain the UI to everyone using ledgers. (Plus my fears of side channel leakage only get exacerbated, especially since our underlying secp library isn't constant time)

@ValarDragon
Copy link
Contributor

Also weren't we aiming for SDK v0.25 by end of this week? If so, this feels a bit optimistic to me. (Like the ABCI codespace thing probably won't happen by end of this week, I'm unsure of the status of most of the purely SDK features)

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Sep 4, 2018

Also weren't we aiming for SDK v0.25 by end of this week? If so, this feels a bit optimistic to me. (Like the ABCI codespace thing probably won't happen by end of this week, I'm unsure of the status of most of the purely SDK features)

Possibly, maybe we should target Monday/Tuesday. When do you expect the ABCI codespace & event updates to be merged upstream?

@jackzampolin
Copy link
Member

I think we are targeting monday/tuesday fwiw

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Sep 6, 2018

I think we are targeting monday/tuesday fwiw

Also, I think we'll cut the ABCI updates from this release target since they aren't in TM 0.24.

@jackzampolin
Copy link
Member

Looking more like an end of week (thursday/friday) release after Standup today.

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Sep 8, 2018

All of #2277, #2241, #2264, #2225, and #2224 block this release.

@ValarDragon
Copy link
Contributor

Can we update the iavl version for next release? #2281

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Sep 9, 2018

Can we update the iavl version for next release? #2281

Let's do. Reviewed & merged.

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Sep 13, 2018

Also we need to include #2210 in this release.

@alexanderbez
Copy link
Contributor

and #2326?

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Sep 25, 2018

Blocked also on #2396.

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Sep 25, 2018

Also blocked on #2372.

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Sep 26, 2018

Also blocked on #2162.

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Oct 2, 2018

Also blocked on #2422.

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Oct 2, 2018

@alexanderbez
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome -- thanks for compiling that @cwgoes. It'll probably be best if we readdress those once the refactor (#2394) has been merged.

@jackzampolin
Copy link
Member

Updated the issue to reflect what needs doing.

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Oct 5, 2018

I think I can also get to #1867 before GoS, since the other staking/slashing issues are done now.

Added to the list above.

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Oct 15, 2018

I think #1673 has to block GoS, it's too much of an attack vector.

@jackzampolin
Copy link
Member

Closing this issue as we have cut the 0.25 release

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants