-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 224
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhance FAQ entry for green/low risk encounters #365
Comments
* first draft of a proposal to reduce ambiguity in the English FAQ entry on green encounters (cf. corona-warn-app#365)
I think this would be a very good improvement because iwith these changes it is 100% clear that every contact with a positive tested Person recorded by the App will be shown to the user. Great work Daniel! |
@Ein-Tim I'm glad you like it 🙂. If you want to work on the German version I'd certainly welcome that. My plan was to change both (English & German version) with PR #366. If you want I can give you access to my fork from which you should be able to directly contribute to the PR afaik. Is this something you'd be interested in? 🙂 |
Sounds good 👍 I'll invite you to my fork in the meantime 🙂. |
I will close this issue in favor of the PR #366 |
Feature description
This is a followup to issue #307 and PR #319.
The current FAQ entry on green encounters reads:
I propose the following changes (changes in bold):
adiagnosis keyson the day to which the diagnosis key belongs."The corrected version then reads:
"The user’s smartphone encountered the smartphone of a person who has subsequently uploaded their diagnosis keys."
Imho the previous version of this statement could be misunderstood to say that the diagnosis key the user matched with was uploaded on the same day the encounter happened which is o/c not the case. This change removes the ambiguity from the statement. Speaking of a specific day in the context of green encounters anyway isn't that useful imho given that green encounters don't show the day on which they happened in CWA.
This is why the Corona-Warn-App can display encounters, but the risk status stays the same."The corrected version then reads:
"This rating doesn't always yield an increased risk in which case those encounters - together with the harmless encounters from above - will be shown in the Corona-Warn-App but the risk status will stay the same."
This change removes ambiguity on whether "very low risk encounters" (<10min or >73 dB) are shown as "green-/low risk" encounters (which they are) and makes clear that all encounters will be shown at least as green-/low-risk encounters in CWA .
I've focused on the English version of the FAQ entry for now, but once this version is in a state which makes everyone happy I'd o/c also translate those changes for the German version 🙂.
I'd be interested what you think of the proposed changes @svengabr @mtb77 @Ein-Tim 🙂.
Problem and motivation
As I stated in the discussion of #319:
This suggestion should reduce ambiguity in this FAQ entry and give users a clearer picture on how encounters which don't change the overall risk status can happen in CWA.
Is this something you're interested in working on
Yes. PR: #366
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: