-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 246
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make ZstdChunkedFooterData write-only #1901
Conversation
ce9cc0f
to
0403a9c
Compare
This code path is usually never triggered because the annotations are present; and it was broken until recently. Remove it to simplify the code and analysis. Signed-off-by: Miloslav Trmač <[email protected]>
It has no non-test users any more, so decrease the size of this package (relevant to non-c/storage callers of c/image). Should not change behavior. Signed-off-by: Miloslav Trmač <[email protected]>
Again, decrease the size of the compression code for c/image. We will simplify this further immediately. Should not change behavior. Signed-off-by: Miloslav Trmač <[email protected]>
Replace it by individual variables. Then formally deprecate the ChecksumAnnotationTarSplit field. Should not change behavior. Signed-off-by: Miloslav Trmač <[email protected]>
We have the ImageSourceChunk data type, and we already construct these values, so scan into them directly instead of having three separate variables for the two bits of data. Should not change behavior. Signed-off-by: Miloslav Trmač <[email protected]>
0403a9c
to
ab5e270
Compare
LGTM |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe, mtrmac The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
8b0c90d
into
containers:main
… as discussed in #1886 .
Cc: @giuseppe