Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

api: auth: fix nil deref #18143

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2023
Merged

Conversation

vrothberg
Copy link
Member

By pulling in the fixes from c/common. Add regression tests to make sure it's not happening another time. The error messages are not ideal and should probably be optimized in the /auth endpoints directly but it's already an improvement over a nil deref.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Fix a potential nil deref in the auth REST endpoints.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added release-note do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. labels Apr 11, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 11, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 11, 2023
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

Fix has been merged into common. I will wait with merging this one until after the vendor dance.

By pulling in the fixes from c/common.  Add regression tests to make
sure it's not happening another time.  The error messages are not
ideal and should probably be optimized in the `/auth` endpoints directly
but it's already an improvement over a nil deref.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
@vrothberg vrothberg marked this pull request as ready for review April 12, 2023 09:27
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 12, 2023
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

Ready to go. @containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Apr 12, 2023

/lgtm
/hold
@vrothberg merge once you feel comfortable.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 12, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 12, 2023
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

vrothberg commented Apr 12, 2023

/hold cancel

Good to go since we have v4.5 branch

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 12, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit f72e02a into containers:main Apr 12, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 1, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 1, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants