-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 201
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pkg/netns: some netns improvements #2168
Conversation
Create a new function to create the netns dir. Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
There are some rather bad problems when we bind mount over multiple times, this is a rather small race but can happen. In order to avoid this take an exclusive lock like ip netns add does because they create the same bind mount setup. As such we will not race against other podman process or ip netns add which is a good thing. Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
The new API should replace the logic from Podman's setupNetNS() which did several things incorrect. First and foremost it never bind mounted the netns dir causing problems when the netns dir was later bind mounted duplicating the netns mounts on diffeent parents which then caused all unmount attempts to fail[1]. Also the Podman code did never check for conlicts so we way end up overwriting an existing netns (super unlikely as we use 16 random bytes but still). At the very least it duplicates the name logic for no reason there so having this all here makes much more sense. Of course we still have to port podman over to this new API. [1] https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-59620 Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
This API is not used anywhere, as such remove it and make the loop in NewNS() better as the netns dir parts should not be part of the loop. Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
We were not able to find or create Copr project
Unless the HTTP status code above is >= 500, please check your configuration for:
|
@giuseppe PTAL |
Podman PR: containers/podman#24024 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe, Luap99 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
see commits, marking as draft until I ported in podman and passed CI there