-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 348
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Lantao Liu <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See comment.
// is not clearly defined in Kubernetes. | ||
// See https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/56374 | ||
// Keep docker's behavior for now. | ||
g.Spec().Process.Capabilities.Ambient = []string{} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If there are ambient caps, let's log that ambient caps are not supported for containers in Kubernetes pods, but that the container will be created with the ambient caps masked.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is no ambient
cap in CRI, these are all containerd implementation details.
Don't think we need to log it. :)
Will fix the presubmit test. We should not use K8s HEAD to test old release branch. |
/test pull-cri-containerd-node-e2e |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/LGTM
Cherrypick #808.
Signed-off-by: Lantao Liu [email protected]