Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: merge pixi-build branch #950

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Nov 18, 2024
Merged

feat: merge pixi-build branch #950

merged 16 commits into from
Nov 18, 2024

Conversation

baszalmstra
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR merges the feat/pixi-build branch into main.

This brings some large changes to the lock-file format together with a new API to interact with it. The format changed because it can now support source based conda packages.

tdejager and others added 16 commits September 20, 2024 15:11
Co-authored-by: Bas Zalmstra <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Bas Zalmstra <[email protected]>
This adds the case that where the hash changed, which happened for my
source build, that a re-install is triggered. I think this is the
correct behavior, not sure if it will trigger *too* many re-installs but
did not feel that would be the case.
This PR significantly refactors the lock-file API to make the
distinction between source and binary conda packages. It also changes
the way we handle borrowing data from the lock-file, preferring
borrowing over owned objects.

The Python bindings have also been completely refactored to be more
pythonic. Instead of having a single `LockedPackage` there is no a class
hierarchy of `LockedPackage` -> `CondaLockedPackage`,
`PypiLockedPackage` -> `CondaLockedSourcePackage` and
`CondaLockedBinaryPackage`.
@baszalmstra baszalmstra merged commit 32eefc8 into main Nov 18, 2024
15 checks passed
@baszalmstra baszalmstra deleted the feat/pixi-build branch November 18, 2024 15:20
@baszalmstra baszalmstra mentioned this pull request Nov 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants