delete repository inline #2396
delete repository inline #2396
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes primarily focused on enhancing the functionality and user feedback of the course management components. Key modifications include updates to the routing logic in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is ✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.
Additional details and impacted files📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
Bundle ReportChanges will increase total bundle size by 2.13kB (0.01%) ⬆️. This is within the configured threshold ✅ Detailed changes
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
app/components/course-page/delete-repository-modal.ts (1)
Line range hint
27-30: Remove redundant null checkSince
repositoryis required in the component's interface (Argstype), this null check is redundant and can be removed.@action async deleteRepository() { - if (!this.args.repository) { - return; - }app/components/course-page/delete-repository-modal.hbs (1)
36-40: LGTM! Consider enhancing accessibility and UX.The conditional rendering provides clear user feedback during the deletion process. Consider these improvements:
<DangerButtonWithTimedConfirmation @onConfirm={{this.deleteRepository}} @size="regular" + disabled={{this.isDeleting}} + aria-busy={{this.isDeleting}} data-test-delete-repository-button > {{#if this.isDeleting}} Deleting... {{else}} Delete {{/if}} </DangerButtonWithTimedConfirmation>tests/acceptance/course-page/delete-repository-test.js (1)
154-159: LGTM! Consider adding a test for repository ID.The test changes look good and properly verify:
- Redirection to the course introduction page with correct query parameters
- UI state after deletion (repository count and available actions)
Since the PR objectives mention the addition of a repository ID, consider adding an assertion to verify the repository ID is properly cleared/reset after deletion.
await waitUntil(() => currentURL() === '/courses/dummy/introduction?repo=new&track=python'); await settled(); // Delete request triggers after redirect await coursePage.repositoryDropdown.click(); assert.strictEqual(coursePage.repositoryDropdown.content.nonActiveRepositoryCount, 0, 'no repositories should be available'); assert.notOk(coursePage.repositoryDropdown.content.text.includes('Delete Repository'), 'delete repository action should not be available'); +// Verify repository ID is cleared +assert.notOk(coursePage.repositoryDropdown.content.text.includes('repository-id'), 'repository ID should be cleared after deletion');
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
app/components/course-card.js(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/delete-repository-modal.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/delete-repository-modal.ts(3 hunks)tests/acceptance/course-page/delete-repository-test.js(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
app/components/course-card.js (2)
49-49: LGTM! Query parameter change aligns with PR objectives.
The change from using a generic parameter to explicitly including the repository ID (repo: this.lastUsedRepository.id) improves the routing logic and supports the new repository deletion workflow.
Let's verify the integration with the delete repository modal:
✅ Verification successful
Query parameter change is consistent with repository handling across components
The verification confirms that:
- The
lastUsedRepository.idis properly accessed in the course-card component - Other components (
delete-repository-modalandrepository-dropdown) consistently use therepoquery parameter for routing - The pattern aligns with the repository-centric navigation flow
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistency of repository ID usage across components
# Expected: Find matching usage of repo parameter in delete repository modal
# Search for repository ID usage in routing logic
rg -A 5 "transitionTo.*course.*introduction.*repo" app/components/
# Search for repository parameter handling in routes
ast-grep --pattern 'queryParams.*repo'
Length of output: 1649
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the route definition and query param handling
# Search for route definitions related to course.introduction
rg -A 5 "course\.introduction" app/routes/
# Search for query param declarations in route files
ast-grep --pattern 'queryParams = [$$$]'
# Search for lastUsedRepository usage to verify its availability
rg "lastUsedRepository" app/components/course-card.js -A 3
Length of output: 432
Line range hint 46-53: Verify handling of edge cases in repository state transitions.
While the implementation looks correct, please ensure proper handling of these scenarios:
- Repository deletion state: Verify the behavior when
lastUsedRepositoryreferences a recently deleted repository - Loading state: Confirm there are no race conditions between repository deletion and route transition
Let's check for error handling in related components:
app/components/course-page/delete-repository-modal.ts (3)
8-8: LGTM: Well-structured state management addition
The addition of the tracked property for managing deletion state is well-implemented and properly typed.
Also applies to: 20-20
31-36: LGTM: Good concurrent deletion prevention
The isDeleting flag effectively prevents multiple concurrent deletion attempts.
39-39: Verify the navigation behavior
The transition includes query parameters that might affect the course introduction page's behavior.
Let's verify the navigation handling:
✅ Verification successful
Navigation behavior is properly handled
The verification shows that:
- The query parameters
repoandtrackare properly defined in the course controller (app/controllers/course.ts) - The course route (
app/routes/course.ts) has explicit handling for bothrepoandtrackquery parameters - The navigation pattern is consistent with other components in the codebase:
repository-dropdown.tsuses the same transition pattern- Multiple components handle these query parameters similarly for repository and track selection
The transition behavior in the delete-repository-modal is consistent with the codebase's navigation patterns and query parameter handling.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for course.introduction route definition and its handling of query parameters
# Search for route definition
rg -A 5 "course\.introduction" app/router.js
# Search for query params handling in the introduction route
ast-grep --pattern 'class IntroductionRoute {
$$$
queryParams = {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 193
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find route and query params handling
# Find router.js file first as it might be in a different location
fd router.js
# Search for introduction route handling across the codebase
rg -g '!*.{json,lock}' -i "course\.introduction"
# Look for query params handling specifically for repo and track
rg -g '!*.{json,lock}' "queryParams.*(?:repo|track)"
# Search for route files related to introduction
fd -g "*introduction*route*.{js,ts}"
Length of output: 3347
app/components/course-page/delete-repository-modal.hbs (1)
36-40: Verify routing behavior after deletion.
The AI summary indicates that after deletion, users should be redirected to the course introduction page. Let's verify this implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Routing behavior after deletion is correctly implemented
The code inspection confirms that the routing behavior matches the AI summary:
- The
DeleteRepositoryModalComponentincludes the correct routing logic to transition to 'course.introduction' with the specified query parameters (repo: 'new', track: trackSlug). - The implementation is verified by acceptance tests in
tests/acceptance/course-page/delete-repository-test.jswhich cover both the modal opening and repository deletion scenarios.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the routing logic implementation in the component and tests
# Check component implementation
echo "Checking DeleteRepositoryModalComponent implementation..."
rg -A 10 "deleteRepository.*=" "app/components/course-page/"
# Verify test expectations
echo "Checking test assertions..."
rg -A 5 "course\.introduction" "tests/acceptance/"
Length of output: 2716
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the component implementation and test files more thoroughly
# Check the delete repository modal component implementation
echo "Checking DeleteRepositoryModal component implementation..."
rg -A 15 "class DeleteRepositoryModal" app/components/course-page/
# Check for any transition/redirect logic in the component
echo "Checking for transition/redirect logic..."
rg -A 10 "transition|redirect" app/components/course-page/delete-repository-modal.ts
# Look for the deleteRepository action implementation
echo "Looking for deleteRepository action..."
ast-grep --pattern 'deleteRepository = async function() { $$$ }'
# Check test files for delete repository scenarios
echo "Checking test files for delete repository scenarios..."
rg -A 10 "test.*delete.*repository" tests/
Length of output: 6298
| const trackSlug = this.args.repository.language?.slug; // Store this before we destroy the record | ||
| await this.args.repository.destroyRecord(); // TODO: Add failure handling |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling and null checks
Two concerns in the deletion logic:
- The TODO comment indicates missing error handling for
destroyRecord() - The
trackSlugderivation doesn't handle the case wherelanguageis null
Consider implementing this safer version:
- const trackSlug = this.args.repository.language?.slug; // Store this before we destroy the record
- await this.args.repository.destroyRecord(); // TODO: Add failure handling
+ const trackSlug = this.args.repository.language?.slug || 'unknown';
+ try {
+ await this.args.repository.destroyRecord();
+ } catch (error) {
+ // Handle error (e.g., show error message to user)
+ this.isDeleting = false;
+ throw error;
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
app/components/course-card.js(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/delete-repository-modal.ts(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/components/course-card.js
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
app/components/course-page/delete-repository-modal.ts
[warning] 32-32: app/components/course-page/delete-repository-modal.ts#L32
Added line #L32 was not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/components/course-page/delete-repository-modal.ts (2)
7-7: LGTM! Good use of tracked property
The addition of @tracked isDeleting is a good practice to prevent concurrent deletions and manage the component's state.
Also applies to: 19-19
36-38:
Improve error handling and state management
Several improvements needed for robustness:
- The
trackSlugcould be undefined iflanguageis null - The navigation could fail
- The
isDeletingstate isn't reset on error
Consider this safer implementation:
- const trackSlug = this.args.repository.language?.slug; // Store this before we destroy the record
- await this.args.repository.destroyRecord(); // TODO: Add failure handling
- this.router.transitionTo('course.introduction', { queryParams: { repo: 'new', track: trackSlug } }).followRedirects();
+ const trackSlug = this.args.repository.language?.slug ?? 'unknown';
+ try {
+ await this.args.repository.destroyRecord();
+ await this.router.transitionTo('course.introduction', {
+ queryParams: { repo: 'new', track: trackSlug }
+ }).followRedirects();
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.isDeleting = false;
+ // TODO: Show error message to user
+ throw error;
+ }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| if (this.isDeleting) { | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| this.isDeleting = true; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Add test for concurrent deletion prevention
The test suite lacks coverage for the concurrent deletion prevention logic (isDeleting flag). The existing tests only verify basic deletion flow but don't test the protection against multiple deletion attempts. Add a test case that:
- Triggers multiple delete clicks in quick succession
- Verifies only one deletion request is made
- Confirms the repository is deleted successfully
Example test:
test('prevents concurrent deletion attempts', async function (assert) {
// ... setup code ...
await coursePage.deleteRepositoryModal.deleteRepositoryButton.press();
await coursePage.deleteRepositoryModal.deleteRepositoryButton.press(); // Second click should be ignored
assert.strictEqual(server.schema.repositories.all().length, 0, 'repository should be deleted once');
});🔗 Analysis chain
Add test coverage for concurrent deletion prevention
The concurrent deletion prevention logic is not covered by tests. This is important functionality that should be verified.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for existing tests of concurrent deletion prevention
# Look for test files related to delete repository
fd "delete-repository.*test" -t f
# Search for concurrent deletion tests in found files
rg -l "concurrent|multiple.*deletion|isDeleting" $(fd "delete-repository.*test" -t f)
Length of output: 233
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual test content to verify coverage
cat tests/acceptance/course-page/delete-repository-test.js
# Also check the component implementation for complete context
cat app/components/course-page/delete-repository-modal.ts
Length of output: 8523
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 32-32: app/components/course-page/delete-repository-modal.ts#L32
Added line #L32 was not covered by tests
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests