Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

execinfrapb: break the dependency on sem/builtins #78470

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2022

Conversation

yuzefovich
Copy link
Member

This commit moves several utility functions from execinfrapb into
execinfra package in order to break the dependency of the former on
sem/builtins (which eventually depends on the c-deps).

Fixes: #78453.

Release note: None

This commit moves several utility functions from `execinfrapb` into
`execinfra` package in order to break the dependency of the former on
`sem/builtins` (which eventually depends on the `c-deps`).

Release note: None
@yuzefovich yuzefovich requested review from Azhng and a team March 25, 2022 02:35
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Collaborator

@mgartner mgartner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewed 16 of 16 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 1 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @Azhng)

@yuzefovich
Copy link
Member Author

TFTR!

bors r+

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Mar 28, 2022

Build succeeded:

@craig craig bot merged commit 7d941bb into cockroachdb:master Mar 28, 2022
@yuzefovich yuzefovich deleted the serverpb-deps branch March 28, 2022 19:19
@yuzefovich
Copy link
Member Author

@Azhng do you want this to be backported to 22.1?

@Azhng
Copy link
Contributor

Azhng commented Mar 30, 2022

Hmm good question, cc @ajwerner what's your thoughts on this?

@ajwerner
Copy link
Contributor

I don't feel strongly. I think the reason to do it is to make future backports less likely to hit conflicts. I vote we may as well do it. It seems to me to carry near zero risk.

@yuzefovich
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah, sounds good to me.

@yuzefovich
Copy link
Member Author

blathers backport 22.1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

serverpb: remove C dependency in serverpb package
5 participants