Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: bring bazel ci up to parity with checks performed in old ci #74557

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2022

Conversation

rickystewart
Copy link
Collaborator

@rickystewart rickystewart commented Jan 6, 2022

Up until this point, checking the release justification and whether all
generated files were up to date was done only in GitHub CI rather than
Bazel CI. We just copy those same checks into Bazel CI as well.

Closes #68385.

Release note: None

@rickystewart rickystewart requested a review from a team as a code owner January 6, 2022 23:43
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

Up until this point, checking the release justification and whether all
generated files were up to date was done only in GitHub CI rather than
Bazel CI. We just copy those same checks into Bazel CI as well.

Closes cockroachdb#68385.

Release note: None
@rickystewart
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@rickystewart rickystewart requested review from rail and celiala January 6, 2022 23:53
Copy link
Collaborator

@celiala celiala left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Example successful build for the new configuration.

Could you direct me to what's being changed in the build logs? ;) [I'm not familiar enough with the bazel and old ci checks to know where to look / what I should be looking for?] Thanks!

A read of the code itself makes senses to me!

Reviewed 7 of 7 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 0 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @rail)

Copy link
Collaborator

@celiala celiala left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approving, since code itself makes sense to me

Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 0 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @rail)

Copy link
Member

@rail rail left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, :shipit:

@rickystewart
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Could you direct me to what's being changed in the build logs? ;) [I'm not familiar enough with the bazel and old ci checks to know where to look / what I should be looking for?] Thanks!

Sorry -- in the build configuration link I sent in that comment, everything is new. It's a fully new build configuration.

@rickystewart
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bors r=rail,celiala

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Jan 7, 2022

Build succeeded:

@craig craig bot merged commit 40cbbfb into cockroachdb:master Jan 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ci: add bazel ensure generated code job for CI
4 participants