Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

roachtest: restart node in kv/quiesence unconditionally #55239

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 8, 2020

Conversation

tbg
Copy link
Member

@tbg tbg commented Oct 6, 2020

When the test fails, restart the node anyway, so we don't get distracted
by a faux "dead node".

Release note: None

When the test fails, restart the node anyway, so we don't get distracted
by a faux "dead node".

Release note: None
@tbg tbg requested a review from knz October 6, 2020 09:17
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

tbg added 3 commits October 6, 2020 11:25
roachtests are never invoked under race.

Release note: None
It's reliably flaky.

Touches cockroachdb#53811.
Touches cockroachdb#54088.
Touches cockroachdb#53760.
Touches cockroachdb#53725.

Release note: None
The consistency check could still happen at a moment at which
not all nodes were live "to each other". A consistency check
that skips a node is between two nodes, so a 50:50 chance of
killing either. Not what we want - we want n1 to be the designated
loser.

Fixes cockroachdb#55205.

Release note: None
@tbg
Copy link
Member Author

tbg commented Oct 8, 2020

Friendly ping.

Copy link
Contributor

@knz knz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r3, 1 of 1 files at r4.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 0 of 0 LGTMs obtained

@tbg
Copy link
Member Author

tbg commented Oct 8, 2020

bors r=knz
TFTR!

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Oct 8, 2020

Build succeeded:

@craig craig bot merged commit 3cceec6 into cockroachdb:master Oct 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants