statusccl: skip flaky TenantStatusAPI tests #105197
Conversation
zachlite
added
backport-22.2.x
backport-23.1.x
|
This change is |
|
a skip "informs", it does not "resolve" - we want the original issues to remain open until the bug has actually been addressed. |
|
LGTM modulo rephrasing the commit message. |
Ack. Thanks for the drive-by. |
Informs cockroachdb#92382, cockroachdb#99770, cockroachdb#99559 Epic: none Release note: None
zachlite
force-pushed
the
230620.skip-flakes
branch
from
dc773a7 to
a2a51bb
Compare
|
bors r+ |
|
Build succeeded: |
|
Encountered an error creating backports. Some common things that can go wrong:
You might need to create your backport manually using the backport tool. error creating merge commit from a2a51bb to blathers/backport-release-22.2-105197: POST https://api.github.com/repos/cockroachdb/cockroach/merges: 409 Merge conflict [] you may need to manually resolve merge conflicts with the backport tool. Backport to branch 22.2.x failed. See errors above. error setting reviewers, but backport branch blathers/backport-release-23.1-105197 is ready: POST https://api.github.com/repos/cockroachdb/cockroach/pulls/105202/requested_reviewers: 422 Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the teams you specified is not a collaborator of the cockroachdb/cockroach repository. [] Backport to branch 23.1.x failed. See errors above. 🦉 Hoot! I am a Blathers, a bot for CockroachDB. My owner is dev-inf. |
This test was mistakenly skipped in cockroachdb#105197, but the flake was addressed in cockroachdb#99054. The flake on the 22.2 release branch (tracked in cockroachdb#92382) was not novel, but un-treated. I misinterpreted this, and thought the skip on master would be for good measure, not realizing the flake was already treated. Epic: none Release note: None
106631: statusccl: unskip testTenantRanges pagination r=zachlite a=zachlite This test was mistakenly skipped in #105197, but the flake was addressed in #99054. The flake on the 22.2 release branch (tracked in #92382) was not novel, but untreated. I misinterpreted this, and thought the skip on master would be for good measure, not realizing the flake was already treated. Epic: none Release note: None Co-authored-by: zachlite <[email protected]>
This test was mistakenly skipped in #105197, but the flake was addressed in #99054. The flake on the 22.2 release branch (tracked in #92382) was not novel, but un-treated. I misinterpreted this, and thought the skip on master would be for good measure, not realizing the flake was already treated. Epic: none Release note: None
Informs #92382, #99770, #99559
Epic: none
Release note: None