-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sql: support ArrayFlatten subqueries within UDFs #98738
Labels
branch-release-23.1
Used to mark GA and release blockers, technical advisories, and bugs for 23.1
C-bug
Code not up to spec/doc, specs & docs deemed correct. Solution expected to change code/behavior.
GA-blocker
T-sql-queries
SQL Queries Team
Comments
rharding6373
added
the
C-bug
Code not up to spec/doc, specs & docs deemed correct. Solution expected to change code/behavior.
label
Mar 16, 2023
Hi @mgartner, please add branch-* labels to identify which branch(es) this release-blocker affects. 🦉 Hoot! I am a Blathers, a bot for CockroachDB. My owner is dev-inf. |
mgartner
added
the
branch-release-23.1
Used to mark GA and release blockers, technical advisories, and bugs for 23.1
label
Mar 17, 2023
mgartner
changed the title
sql: udf expectedLazyRoutineError
sql: support ArrayFlatten subqueries within UDFs
Mar 17, 2023
mgartner
added a commit
to mgartner/cockroach
that referenced
this issue
Mar 17, 2023
Array-flatten subqueries (e.g., `ARRAY(SELECT a FROM t)`) are now supported within UDFs. They are now converted to a normal subquery with a ScalarGroupBy if they exist within a UDF, even if they are uncorrelated. This allows them to be executed without any changes to the execbuilder or the evaluation logic of `tree.Routine`. Fixes cockroachdb#98738 Release note: None
mgartner
added a commit
to mgartner/cockroach
that referenced
this issue
Mar 20, 2023
Array-flatten subqueries (e.g., `ARRAY(SELECT a FROM t)`) are now supported within UDFs. They are now converted to a normal subquery with a ScalarGroupBy if they exist within a UDF, even if they are uncorrelated. This allows them to be executed without any changes to the execbuilder or the evaluation logic of `tree.Routine`. Fixes cockroachdb#98738 Release note: None
craig bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 21, 2023
98527: sql: deprecate gossip-based physical planning r=dt a=dt Previously system tenants and secondary tenants used differnt physical planning implementations, with the system tenant and only the system tenant using nodeIDs while other tenants used the instance table. This unifies those implementations such that all tenants use NodeIDs if running in mixed mode and use the instance table if not. Release note: none. Epic: CRDB-16910 98879: sql: support array-flatten subqueries within UDFs r=mgartner a=mgartner Array-flatten subqueries (e.g., `ARRAY(SELECT a FROM t)`) are now supported within UDFs. They are now converted to a normal subquery with a ScalarGroupBy if they exist within a UDF, even if they are uncorrelated. This allows them to be executed without any changes to the execbuilder or the evaluation logic of `tree.Routine`. Fixes #98738 Release note: None 98988: ui: add badges for filter elements r=maryliag a=maryliag Adds badges for each of the selected filters on SQL Activity and Insights pages. Part Of #98891 https://www.loom.com/share/e7417209fc704d71b2733f58609fb4de <img width="1160" alt="Screenshot 2023-03-19 at 1 30 49 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1017486/226195412-03d3ef58-5d6d-4c24-84f1-6a55b952f5c0.png"> Release note (ui change): Adds badges for each selected filter on SQL Activity and Insights pages. 99042: sql: added indexes to system.statement_statistics, system.transaction_statistics r=ericharmeling a=ericharmeling Fixes #98624. This commit adds indexes on new computed columns to the system.statement_statistics and system.transaction_statistics tables. Epic: none Release note: None 99054: pkg/ccl: Unskip TestTenantStatusAPI/tenant_ranges/pagination r=dhartunian a=abarganier Fixes: #92979 Previously, in #97386, we skipped test_tenant_ranges_pagination because it was marked as flaky. The test makes a request for a single range and expects an offset of `1` back. It then uses this offset to request a second range, and expects an offset of `2`. This means that the test requires at least 3 ranges to exist on the tenant. The test was flaking on the assertion that the offset returned by the second request came back as `2`. Instead, it was flaking when the offset came back as `0`, which signifies that there are no more ranges to process. We learned that the tenant create process has an asycnhronous splitting of ranges that occurs, which is what would lead to this sporadic scenario where not enough ranges existed (yet) for the test to succeed. This patch updates the test with a `testutils.SucceedsSoon` clause that checks first that `crdb_internal.ranges` contains at least 3 ranges, prior to making the second request. This should provide sufficient time for the range split queue to be processed and eliminate the vast majority of these test flakes. Release note: none 99119: kvserver: mark in-flight storage checkpoints r=tbg a=pavelkalinnikov This commit makes it so that the consistency checker checkpoints are first created in a "_pending" folder, and only after completion are atomically renamed to the intended directory name. This is to help distinguish valid checkpoints from the ones that weren't finalized (for example, when the node crashed in the meantime). Part of #81819 Epic: none Release note (ops change): checkpoint directories (that can be created in the rare event of range inconsistency) are now clearly indicated as pending until they are fully populated. This is to help operators to distinguish valid checkpoints from corrupted ones. Co-authored-by: David Taylor <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Marcus Gartner <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: maryliag <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Eric Harmeling <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alex Barganier <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Pavel Kalinnikov <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
branch-release-23.1
Used to mark GA and release blockers, technical advisories, and bugs for 23.1
C-bug
Code not up to spec/doc, specs & docs deemed correct. Solution expected to change code/behavior.
GA-blocker
T-sql-queries
SQL Queries Team
The following UDF is able to be created, but unexpectedly fails because the subquery was unable to be planned lazily:
Jira issue: CRDB-25554
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: