-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] Remove all std::pair<X, Y>
dictionaries as unnecessary
#45466
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-45466/40925
|
A new Pull Request was created by @makortel for master. It involves the following packages:
@Dr15Jones, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @Martin-Grunewald, @SiewYan, @alberto-sanchez, @aloeliger, @bbilin, @civanch, @cmsbuild, @consuegs, @epalencia, @francescobrivio, @ftorrresd, @hqucms, @jfernan2, @makortel, @mandrenguyen, @mdhildreth, @menglu21, @mkirsano, @mmusich, @perrotta, @saumyaphor4252, @smuzaffar, @srimanob, @subirsarkar, @tvami, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT AddOn Unit TestsI found 5 errors in the following unit tests: ---> test testCalibTrackerSiStripCommon had ERRORS ---> test test_MC_23_crosscheck had ERRORS ---> test test_MC_22_crosscheck had ERRORS and more ... RelVals
Expand to see more relval errors ...
RelVals-INPUT
Expand to see more relval errors ...
AddOn Tests
Expand to see more addon errors ...
|
Ok, this will need a deeper understanding on how to evolve the framework's dictionary existence checking. |
PR description:
According to #32444 (comment) the dictionaries for
std::pair<X, Y>
are not needed anymore, and some of them were giving trouble in #45423 (comment). This PR experiments what will happen if all of them would be removed.While doing this I encountered several dictionaries on std-only types in various packages that should be in
DataFormats/StdDictionaries
orDataFormats/WrappedStdDictionaries
, so I took the opportunity to move them in the right place.PR validation:
None
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Potentially to be backported to 14_0_X in some form (for #45423)