-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add 2023 WFs in runTheMatrix for tests #42588
Conversation
please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42588/36616
|
A new Pull Request was created by @sunilUIET (sunil bansal) for master. It involves the following packages:
@bbilin, @miquork, @sunilUIET, @srimanob, @AdrianoDee can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-682c67/34323/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+pdmv |
Hi @sunilUIET |
@srimanob good point. We can add say JetMET for 2022 C,D 2023C,D. If you think any other addition will be good, please let me know. |
Hi @sunilUIET |
adding data WF, reducing 2021 MC WFs
please test |
please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42588/36811
|
Pull request #42588 was updated. @bbilin, @miquork, @sunilUIET, @srimanob, @AdrianoDee can you please check and sign again. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-682c67/34611/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+pdmv |
+Upgrade Note to @cms-sw/reconstruction-l2 to update the comparison matrix later. Thx. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
This PR adds more 2023 WFs in the runTheMatrix to be consistent with WFs with 2022 conditions as discussed in #41410