Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace Geometry_cff with GeometryDB_cff in RecoEcal #38786

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 17, 2022

Conversation

jeongeun
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:
Review on the Reco part of #31113

process.load("Configuration.StandardSequences.Geometry_cff")
was outdated #8810
It should be replaced with
process.load("Configuration.StandardSequences.GeometryDB_cff")

In this PR, RecoEcal configuration files (2 files) are fixed.

modified:   RecoEcal/EgammaClusterProducers/test/testRecoEcal_cfg.py
modified:   RecoEcal/EgammaClusterProducers/test/testRecoEcal_cfgV2.py

PR validation:

Tested in CMSSW_12_5_X, the basic test all passed in the CMSSW PR instructions

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38786/31139

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @jeongeun (JeongEun Lee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • RecoEcal/EgammaClusterProducers (reconstruction)

@jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Sam-Harper, @lecriste, @rchatter, @jainshilpi, @valsdav, @rovere, @lgray, @sobhatta, @thomreis, @afiqaize, @simonepigazzini, @wrtabb, @argiro, @varuns23, @ram1123 this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4e67db/26327/summary.html
COMMIT: 0605085
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-07-19-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/38786/26327/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3662417
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3662387
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
  • Checked 208 log files, 45 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

Dear @cms-sw/ecal-dpg-l2 , it seems to me the config files fixed by this PR aren't updated since CMSSW_3_X_Y cycle.
Do you know if we still need it, maybe used in some unit-test, or we can remove them? Thanks

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

Dear @cms-sw/ecal-dpg-l2 , it seems to me the config files fixed by this PR aren't updated since CMSSW_3_X_Y cycle. Do you know if we still need it, maybe used in some unit-test, or we can remove them? Thanks

A kind ping to @cms-sw/ecal-dpg-l2 , please, if you can have a look. Thanks

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @thomreis, could you please have a look at these cfgs and check with ecal people whether they are still needed? Thanks

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @clacaputo these test config files are not needed anymore as far as I can tell and can be removed.

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @clacaputo these test config files are not needed anymore as far as I can tell and can be removed.

Thanks, @thomreis . @jeongeun , could you please take care of it?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38786/31597

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #38786 was updated. @jpata, @cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo can you please check and sign again.

@jpata
Copy link
Contributor

jpata commented Aug 17, 2022

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4e67db/26865/summary.html
COMMIT: 0a249e8
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-08-16-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/38786/26865/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3692500
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3692470
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 50 files compared)
  • Checked 212 log files, 49 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@jpata
Copy link
Contributor

jpata commented Aug 17, 2022

+reconstruction

  • delete outdated files

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants