-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixing Phase-II Patatrack Failures #36607
Conversation
@makortel this should fix both issues, thanks for spotting and reporting them! |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36607/27581
|
A new Pull Request was created by @AdrianoDee for master. It involves the following packages:
@makortel, @slava77, @clacaputo, @cmsbuild, @fwyzard, @jpata can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
test parameters: workflows = 39434.501,39434.502,39434.5 |
type bug-fix |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4e66d2/21490/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
cudaStreamSynchronize(stream); | ||
assert(tkhitH.view()); | ||
assert(tkhitH.view()->nHits() == unsigned(nHits)); | ||
assert(tkhitH.view()->nMaxModules() == unsigned(nModules)); | ||
assert(tkhitH.view()->nMaxModules() == 1856); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
shouldn't this be phase1PixelTopology::numberOfModules
?
Similar for the phase2 case below
- tests in TrackingRecHit2DCUDA_t - wf 39434.502 due to esconsumes in SiPixelPhase2DigiToClusterCUDA - including pixelTopology constants
4184826
to
5179447
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36607/27594
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4e66d2/21505/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+reconstruction
|
urgent |
can @cms-sw/heterogeneous-l2 please have a look? |
as soon as I'm no longer ill ... |
+heterogeneous |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
thanks @makortel 👍 |
+1 |
Fixing failures in