Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

handle empty stack yaml file configuration #791

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged

handle empty stack yaml file configuration #791

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

haitham911
Copy link
Collaborator

@haitham911 haitham911 commented Nov 17, 2024

what

handle empty stack yaml file configuration

why

Atmos Validate Should Not Error on Empty Files

references

before fix : atmos validate stacks
https://linear.app/cloudposse/issue/DEV-2362/atmos-validate-should-not-error-on-empty-files
2024-11-17 12_41_16-Window
after :
2024-11-17 12_42_18-Window

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Adjusted the behavior of file content retrieval to return an empty map instead of a nil value when the specified content is empty, improving consistency in data handling.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 17, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes made in this pull request involve a modification to the GetFileContent function in the internal/exec/stack_processor_utils.go file. The function's return behavior has been adjusted to return an empty map instead of a nil value when the stackYamlConfig is an empty string. This ensures that the function explicitly defines its return value for empty content, while the overall structure and logic of the function remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
internal/exec/stack_processor_utils.go Modified GetFileContent to return an empty map when stackYamlConfig is an empty string.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Allow empty manifests in JSONSchema (DEV-2362) The change does not address the need for empty file handling in validation.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

patch

Suggested reviewers

  • Gowiem
  • aknysh
  • nitrocode

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fbb6f2a and 8811dec.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • internal/exec/stack_processor_utils.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • internal/exec/stack_processor_utils.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary or @auto-summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @auto-title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Nov 17, 2024
@aknysh aknysh added minor New features that do not break anything patch A minor, backward compatible change and removed minor New features that do not break anything labels Nov 19, 2024
Copy link
Member

@aknysh aknysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @haitham911

@aknysh aknysh merged commit 1020645 into main Nov 19, 2024
32 checks passed
@aknysh aknysh deleted the DEV-2362 branch November 19, 2024 05:11
Copy link

These changes were released in v1.107.1.

Cerebrovinny pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
* fix: handle empty stack YAML configuration and adjust file content retrieval

* fix: return existing content from GetFileContent instead of an empty string

* fix: remove unnecessary blank lines in ProcessYAMLConfigFile and GetFileContent functions
aknysh added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2024
* folder creation vendor fix

* display error logic

* Revert "display error logic"

This reverts commit 1b5f112.

* restore condition to continue vendor process if not exists

* handle empty stack yaml file configuration (#791)

* fix: handle empty stack YAML configuration and adjust file content retrieval

* fix: return existing content from GetFileContent instead of an empty string

* fix: remove unnecessary blank lines in ProcessYAMLConfigFile and GetFileContent functions

* Set Default Schema to Remote Schema (#777)

* feat: set default Atmos manifest URL if not specified in configuration

* feat: log trace message when using default Atmos JSON Schema file

* fix: improve error message for missing Atmos JSON Schema file

* Update internal/exec/validate_stacks.go

* fix: change log level from trace to info for default Atmos JSON Schema message

* fix: change log level from info to trace for default Atmos JSON Schema message

---------

Co-authored-by: Erik Osterman (CEO @ Cloud Posse) <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andriy Knysh <[email protected]>

* added better error handling

* added vendor config integration tests

* explain package name choose

Co-authored-by: Erik Osterman (CEO @ Cloud Posse) <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Andriy Knysh <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Haitham Rageh <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Erik Osterman (CEO @ Cloud Posse) <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
patch A minor, backward compatible change
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants