Tree: "end" value for parent-position #429
Comments
johannes-wolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 10, 2024
This solves the issue I created last week (#429) and adds another layout choice where the parent is offset relative to the children. Both values seem more useful for "right" and "left" direction, and actually, the "after-end" option seems more useful to me, as it allows to render a more hierarchical layout without overlapping, like this question asked on Discord: https://discord.com/channels/1054443721975922748/1193008120688037988 I did not change the existing behavior, but it was very surprising to me to see that when choosing "right" or "left" as direction, the nodes at filled from bottom to top, and it is necessary to choose "end" to have the parent on top. Is it that way for a reason? I would prefer a "before-beginning" rather than "after-end" to indicate that I want my parent above the children, it seems more intuitive to me.
|
Fixed on 0.2.0. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The documentation says that for a tree, the
parent-positionsetting can bebegin,centerorend. However, onlybeginandcenterare actually implemented. It seems easy to addend, was it forgotten or removed because of a specific issue and the documentation was not updated?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: