Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Add function to detect if non-operational status is due to wire kink #587

Merged
merged 58 commits into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

Drewniok
Copy link
Collaborator

@Drewniok Drewniok commented Nov 19, 2024

Description

This PR adds a function that determines if the layout is non-operational due to kinks.

Checklist:

  • The pull request only contains commits that are related to it.
  • I have added appropriate tests and documentation.
  • I have added a changelog entry.
  • I have created/adjusted the Python bindings for any new or updated functionality.
  • I have made sure that all CI jobs on GitHub pass.
  • The pull request introduces no new warnings and follows the project's style guidelines.

@Drewniok Drewniok added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 19, 2024
@Drewniok Drewniok self-assigned this Nov 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clang-tidy made some suggestions

Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clang-tidy made some suggestions

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clang-tidy made some suggestions

test/algorithms/simulation/sidb/is_operational.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/algorithms/simulation/sidb/is_operational.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
marcelwa
marcelwa previously approved these changes Nov 24, 2024
@marcelwa
Copy link
Collaborator

@Drewniok sorry I was too fast with the approval. Once you fixed the CI, we can merge though 🙂

@Drewniok
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@marcelwa Some other changes were necessary due to some mistakes I made. It would be great if you could go through it again. Thank you very much! 🙏

Copy link
Collaborator

@marcelwa marcelwa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks mostly great. I noticed a few small things. Could you also please add a CHANGELOG entry?

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clang-tidy made some suggestions

@Drewniok Drewniok merged commit 1cd3597 into cda-tum:main Nov 26, 2024
65 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants