Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add protoc-gen-orion usage into readme #190

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

cs-lexliu
Copy link
Contributor

We introduce the new features in #189. Add a usage into readme to explain how to use the tool.

@cs-lexliu cs-lexliu requested a review from a team as a code owner September 27, 2022 08:12
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 27, 2022

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 43.88%. Comparing base (b8e9942) to head (3e3cad9).
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

❗ Current head 3e3cad9 differs from pull request most recent head bd95c95. Consider uploading reports for the commit bd95c95 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #190       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   57.97%   43.88%   -14.10%     
===========================================
  Files          13        6        -7     
  Lines         564      319      -245     
===========================================
- Hits          327      140      -187     
+ Misses        230      176       -54     
+ Partials        7        3        -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated
3. The [sample](https://github.com/carousell/Orion/blob/master/protoc-gen-orion/testprotos/example/example.proto.orion.pb.go) of the result after you execute the command.

#### For version of `protoc-gen-go` higher and equal than v1.20.0.
You should enable the **exported-service-desc** flag to get the correct service description.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this a "must" or just "should"?

@achichen achichen self-assigned this Oct 11, 2022
@achichen achichen assigned praveensanap and unassigned achichen Nov 8, 2022
@vipulsodha vipulsodha closed this Mar 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants