Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature parity between buf protoc and protoc #496

Closed
amckinney opened this issue Aug 31, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Feature parity between buf protoc and protoc #496

amckinney opened this issue Aug 31, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
Feature New feature or request

Comments

@amckinney
Copy link
Contributor

This issue tracks the overall work required to build feature parity between buf protoc and protoc.

Additional context found while investigating buf protoc usage with Bazel is included below:

  • Bazel relys on undocumented protoc flags and undocumented behavior in existing flags (e.g. --direct_dependencies, which is defined here, and used here).
  • Bazel uses -I<virtualpath>=<realpath> for the -I flag (which is defined here, and used here).
@amckinney amckinney added Feature New feature or request P2 labels Aug 31, 2021
@bufdev
Copy link
Member

bufdev commented Feb 4, 2022

We have now deleted buf protoc by moving it to alpha in #915, and will likely eventually delete it entirely. As such, going to close this issue as buf protoc will almost for sure not be worked on in the future. If we decide to revisit this decision, we should reopen this issue. All issues that were closed are tracked on the #915.

@bufdev bufdev closed this as completed Feb 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants