Trivial warning fix for MSVC14 #8
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
warning C4456: declaration of 'c' hides previous local declaration
raffienficiaud
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2014
Trivial warning fix for MSVC14
ecatmur
added a commit
to ecatmur/test
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2021
Detected by asan with gcc10:
==863==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: invalid-pointer-pair: 0x7ffe21c831b0 0x00000c26f470
#0 0x2688702 in boost::unit_test::framework::state::priority_order::operator()(boost::unit_test::test_observer*, boost::unit_test::test_observer*) const libs/test/include/boost/test/impl/framework.ipp:865
boostorg#1 0x2688702 in std::_Rb_tree<boost::unit_test::test_observer*, boost::unit_test::test_observer*, std::_Identity<boost::unit_test::test_observer*>, boost::unit_test::framework::state::priority_order, std::allocator<boost::unit_test::test_observer*> >::_M_get_insert_unique_pos(boost::unit_test::test_observer* const&) /opt/gcc-10.2.0/include/c++/10.2.0/bits/stl_tree.h:2101
boostorg#2 0x268aafb in std::pair<std::_Rb_tree_iterator<boost::unit_test::test_observer*>, bool> std::_Rb_tree<boost::unit_test::test_observer*, boost::unit_test::test_observer*, std::_Identity<boost::unit_test::test_observer*>, boost::unit_test::framework::state::priority_order, std::allocator<boost::unit_test::test_observer*> >::_M_insert_unique<boost::unit_test::test_observer*>(boost::unit_test::test_observer*&&) /opt/gcc-10.2.0/include/c++/10.2.0/bits/stl_tree.h:2154
boostorg#3 0x2614ac4 in std::set<boost::unit_test::test_observer*, boost::unit_test::framework::state::priority_order, std::allocator<boost::unit_test::test_observer*> >::insert(boost::unit_test::test_observer*&&) /opt/gcc-10.2.0/include/c++/10.2.0/bits/stl_set.h:521
boostorg#4 0x2614ac4 in boost::unit_test::framework::register_observer(boost::unit_test::test_observer&) libs/test/include/boost/test/impl/framework.ipp:1380
boostorg#5 0x2642b56 in boost::unit_test::framework::register_observer_helper::register_obs() libs/test/include/boost/test/impl/framework.ipp:1627
boostorg#6 0x2642b56 in boost::unit_test::framework::run(unsigned long, bool) libs/test/include/boost/test/impl/framework.ipp:1731
boostorg#7 0x27f6c77 in boost::unit_test::unit_test_main(boost::unit_test::test_suite* (*)(int, char**), int, char**) libs/test/include/boost/test/impl/unit_test_main.ipp:250
boostorg#8 0x27f9495 in main libs/test/include/boost/test/impl/unit_test_main.ipp:306
boostorg#9 0x7f8d8b3c1554 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:266
boostorg#10 0x568e0d (test+0x568e0d)
ecatmur
added a commit
to ecatmur/test
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2021
Detected by asan with gcc10:
==863==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: invalid-pointer-pair: 0x7ffe21c831b0 0x00000c26f470
#0 0x2688702 in boost::unit_test::framework::state::priority_order::operator()(boost::unit_test::test_observer*, boost::unit_test::test_observer*) const libs/test/include/boost/test/impl/framework.ipp:865
boostorg#1 0x2688702 in std::_Rb_tree<boost::unit_test::test_observer*, boost::unit_test::test_observer*, std::_Identity<boost::unit_test::test_observer*>, boost::unit_test::framework::state::priority_order, std::allocator<boost::unit_test::test_observer*> >::_M_get_insert_unique_pos(boost::unit_test::test_observer* const&) /opt/gcc-10.2.0/include/c++/10.2.0/bits/stl_tree.h:2101
boostorg#2 0x268aafb in std::pair<std::_Rb_tree_iterator<boost::unit_test::test_observer*>, bool> std::_Rb_tree<boost::unit_test::test_observer*, boost::unit_test::test_observer*, std::_Identity<boost::unit_test::test_observer*>, boost::unit_test::framework::state::priority_order, std::allocator<boost::unit_test::test_observer*> >::_M_insert_unique<boost::unit_test::test_observer*>(boost::unit_test::test_observer*&&) /opt/gcc-10.2.0/include/c++/10.2.0/bits/stl_tree.h:2154
boostorg#3 0x2614ac4 in std::set<boost::unit_test::test_observer*, boost::unit_test::framework::state::priority_order, std::allocator<boost::unit_test::test_observer*> >::insert(boost::unit_test::test_observer*&&) /opt/gcc-10.2.0/include/c++/10.2.0/bits/stl_set.h:521
boostorg#4 0x2614ac4 in boost::unit_test::framework::register_observer(boost::unit_test::test_observer&) libs/test/include/boost/test/impl/framework.ipp:1380
boostorg#5 0x2642b56 in boost::unit_test::framework::register_observer_helper::register_obs() libs/test/include/boost/test/impl/framework.ipp:1627
boostorg#6 0x2642b56 in boost::unit_test::framework::run(unsigned long, bool) libs/test/include/boost/test/impl/framework.ipp:1731
boostorg#7 0x27f6c77 in boost::unit_test::unit_test_main(boost::unit_test::test_suite* (*)(int, char**), int, char**) libs/test/include/boost/test/impl/unit_test_main.ipp:250
boostorg#8 0x27f9495 in main libs/test/include/boost/test/impl/unit_test_main.ipp:306
boostorg#9 0x7f8d8b3c1554 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:266
boostorg#10 0x568e0d (test+0x568e0d)
Clarify formatting
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
warning C4456: declaration of 'c' hides previous local declaration