Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Add ozone proxy for getLikes and getRepostedBy #2624

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

foysalit
Copy link
Contributor

@foysalit foysalit commented Jul 3, 2024

This helps mod view the likers and reposters of posts from within ozone. Especially helpful for takendown content.

@foysalit foysalit changed the title Add ozone proxy for getLikes and getRepostedBy ✨ Add ozone proxy for getLikes and getRepostedBy Jul 3, 2024
@devinivy devinivy merged commit 34c1b9b into main Jul 3, 2024
10 checks passed
@devinivy devinivy deleted the ozone-likes-proxy branch July 3, 2024 23:02
estrattonbailey added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2024
…cements

* origin/main: (181 commits)
  Minor OAuth client fixes (#2640)
  Version packages (#2639)
  OAuth: 2FA (#2633)
  Version packages (#2622)
  Update data source for `getSuggestedFollowsByActor` (#2630)
  Add in-memory did cache to Ozone backend (#2635)
  Filter out reference lists from `getLists` (#2629)
  lexicons: add missing ozone Tag event type to unions (#2632)
  ✨ Add ozone proxy for getLikes and getRepostedBy (#2624)
  Upgrade pnpm/action-setup in workflows (#2625)
  ✨ Add proxy for user typeahead through ozone (#2612)
  Fix development commands (#2623)
  Add starter packs to post hydration (#2613)
  Social proof blocks (#2603)
  Appview: apply hosting status in getRecord (#2620)
  Add `labelersPref` to `getPreferences` union return types (#2554)
  Version packages (#2618)
  Add new preference and api for bsky app state; also put preference updates within transactional lock regions (#2492)
  remove mentions of sandbox (#2611)
  Appview: simple fix for no-hosted known followers (#2609)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants