-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For Cycle 16 #642
Comments
I have a hard time valuing this work. While we do need a test framework and I think the code is good, there is a lot of money going into code that's not actually useful for end users. On the other hand, we have previously been severely lacking in tests, and this framework will allow us to set up more live like tests. Very good stuff, but useless if Bisq is no longer around. I suggest that we should focus on producing features for api users going forward, especially now that we have this test framework. There will likely be traders that are happy to start tinkering at that point and we will quickly learn where we need to focus. |
Sorry for jumping in that late because of vacation. I agree what @sqrrm is mentioning above. I'll have a look if the Codacy issues are wrong so it can be merged to master and compensated. |
I expected this valid questioning and pushback to the CR. I can be flexible about the amount requested, but when I was ready to submit the PR about a month ago, I thought it was worth more than 10K USD. Let me respond to your comments and give you my plan for the next phase of development. Maybe it will help you decide to approve this CR as is, or not. Although the Below is a list of tasks I am currently working on, starting with the work already done, and saved in a scratch branch. Finish and fix
Below are descriptions of two completed tasks I will add to new PRs, and be part of my next CR (Cycle 17):
The next task is figure out how, then implement registration of dispute and refund agents in an arbitration :daemon. After that, I go back to the "simplest trading script" task list defined in Issue 4257, and implmenent Now that |
The |
Having considered this a bit further, I approve of this compensation request seeing it as a part of the whole API project. It's already able to run the tests which is something we haven't been able to do before. It will also help speed up the upcoming API dev. |
Proposal tx: |
Issuance by Team:
Total Issuance: 14706.00 BSQ (equivalent to: 10000.00 USD) |
was:accepted |
Summary
14706
Contributions delivered
Contributions in progress
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: