Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For Cycle 12 #521

Closed
freimair opened this issue Mar 31, 2020 · 7 comments
Closed

For Cycle 12 #521

freimair opened this issue Mar 31, 2020 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
team:dev https://bisq.wiki/Dev_Team was:accepted Indicates that a compensation request was accepted by DAO voting
Milestone

Comments

@freimair
Copy link
Member

freimair commented Mar 31, 2020

Summary

Specify the total amount of BSQ you are requesting:

  • BSQ requested: 4850 USD / 0.56 = 8661 BSQ

Contributions delivered

Provide links to contributions you have delivered, the amount of BSQ you are requesting for each, and any comments that will help stakeholders understand its value.

PR reviews (USD 100,00)

Contributions staged for merging

Provide links to work you're involved with that is still in progress. This section is optional, and is for your own benefit in keeping track of what you're doing and keeping other contributors up to date with the same.

Roles performed

Provide links to your monthly report on any roles you are responsible for.

@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Apr 2, 2020

There's been a change in the way USD per BSQ is calculated. Now, for this cycle, it's 0.56 USD/BSQ.

Please update.

@cbeams cbeams added this to the Cycle 12 milestone Apr 7, 2020
@freimair freimair changed the title [WIP] For Cycle 12 For Cycle 12 Apr 14, 2020
@ripcurlx ripcurlx added the team:dev https://bisq.wiki/Dev_Team label Apr 15, 2020
@ripcurlx
Copy link
Contributor

  • Counter memchain-too-long error via (USD 1040,00)

The other items are looking fine, but for this I just wanted to know what is the reason for this amount? Was it because of the extended testing requirement?

@ripcurlx
Copy link
Contributor

@freimair explained on Keybase that it is a combination based on the complexity of the issue and the testing requirements that resulted in this amount.

With that my team lead review is complete and I approve this request.

@freimair
Copy link
Member Author

@wiz
Copy link
Member

wiz commented Apr 20, 2020

I just want to comment that @freimair's work on various critical issues this cycle were extremely valuable to Bisq, especially Tor V3 and too-long-mempool-chain. Thank you for your hard work 🏆

@wiz wiz removed their assignment Apr 20, 2020
@MwithM MwithM added the was:accepted Indicates that a compensation request was accepted by DAO voting label Apr 27, 2020
@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Apr 27, 2020

Closing as accepted.

@MwithM MwithM closed this as completed Apr 27, 2020
@sqrrm
Copy link
Member

sqrrm commented Apr 28, 2020

There are some inconsistencies with the vote result calculation for cycle 12. We are looking into it. Please avoid moving any BTC in your BSQ wallet for now, they might actually be BSQ that failed to get colored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
team:dev https://bisq.wiki/Dev_Team was:accepted Indicates that a compensation request was accepted by DAO voting
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants