-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update buscolite to 24.11.3 #51898
Update buscolite to 24.11.3 #51898
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@mencian has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 30 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces changes to the Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
recipes/buscolite/meta.yaml
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
recipes/buscolite/meta.yaml (1)
10-10
: Verify SHA256 checksum authenticity.
The SHA256 checksum has been updated as expected with the version change.
Let's verify the checksum matches the source tarball:
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ | |||
{% set name = "buscolite" %} | |||
{% set version = "23.10.26" %} | |||
{% set version = "24.11.3" %} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Version update is incorrect - missing 'v' prefix
The version in meta.yaml should be "v24.11.3" to match the upstream release tag format. All releases in the repository use the 'v' prefix (v24.11.3, v24.7.29, v23.10.26, etc.).
🔗 Analysis chain
Version update looks correct.
The version update from 23.10.26 to 24.11.3 follows the expected date-based versioning pattern. The build number is correctly reset to 0 for the new version.
Let's verify the version exists in the upstream repository:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the version tag exists in the upstream repository
gh release view 24.11.3 --repo nextgenusfs/buscolite
Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check all available releases to see the correct version format
gh release list --repo nextgenusfs/buscolite --limit 10
Length of output: 307
Update
buscolite
: 23.10.26 → 24.11.3recipes/buscolite
(click to view/edit other files)This pull request was automatically generated (see docs).