Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update mgnify-pipelines-toolkit to 0.1.7 #51237

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2024

Conversation

BiocondaBot
Copy link
Collaborator

Update mgnify-pipelines-toolkit: 0.1.60.1.7

install with bioconda Conda

Info Link or Description
Recipe recipes/mgnify-pipelines-toolkit (click to view/edit other files)
Summary Collection of scripts and tools for MGnify pipelines
Home https://github.com/EBI-Metagenomics/mgnify-pipelines-toolkit
Releases https://pypi.org/pypi/mgnify_pipelines_toolkit/json
Recipe Maintainer(s) @chrisAta

This pull request was automatically generated (see docs).

@BiocondaBot BiocondaBot added autobump Automatic Version Update new version labels Oct 8, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 8, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces an update to the meta.yaml file for the mgnify-pipelines-toolkit package. The primary changes include an increment in the version number from "0.1.6" to "0.1.7" and an update to the SHA256 checksum, changing it from a89ad126b2b3e57552dddd1ddd935ed5a269376cd351328712eb30fb92006fc9 to 506eb725d226ff33ceaf8001502a0ab97bcaf41ac84ce011f98a2ccb892389ed. No additional modifications to the structure or content of the meta.yaml file are recorded beyond these updates.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update: Metabuli 1.0.8 #51030: The changes in this PR involve updating the version and SHA256 checksum in the meta.yaml file, similar to the version and checksum updates in the main PR for mgnify-pipelines-toolkit.
  • Update piper to 0.14.3 #51113: This PR also updates the version and SHA256 checksum in the meta.yaml file, reflecting a similar type of change as seen in the main PR.
  • Update mycotools to 0.32.3 #51116: Similar to the main PR, this PR updates the version and SHA256 checksum in the meta.yaml file for the mycotools package.
  • Update sdrf-pipelines to 0.0.30 #51199: This PR updates the version and SHA256 checksum in the meta.yaml file, paralleling the changes made in the main PR.
  • Update meta.yaml, VITAP v.1.7 #51220: This PR updates the version and SHA256 checksum in the meta.yaml file for the vitap package, mirroring the changes in the main PR.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c41cc34 and e377ae4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • recipes/mgnify-pipelines-toolkit/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
recipes/mgnify-pipelines-toolkit/meta.yaml (3)

2-2: Version update looks good.

The version has been correctly updated from 0.1.6 to 0.1.7, which aligns with the PR objectives.


Line range hint 1-85: Overall assessment: Changes look good, pending checksum verification.

The updates to the meta.yaml file are minimal and appropriate for a version bump from 0.1.6 to 0.1.7:

  1. The version number has been correctly updated.
  2. The SHA256 checksum has been updated (pending verification).
  3. The build number remains at 0, which is correct for a new version.
  4. No other changes were made, which is appropriate as dependencies and other configurations likely remain the same for this minor version update.

These changes align with the PR objectives and the expected updates for a version bump. Once the SHA256 checksum is verified, this update should be good to proceed.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)


10-10: SHA256 checksum update looks good, but needs verification.

The SHA256 checksum has been updated, which is expected with a new version. However, it's crucial to verify that this new checksum corresponds to the correct source package for version 0.1.7.

To verify the SHA256 checksum, please run the following script:


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@chrisAta
Copy link
Contributor

chrisAta commented Oct 8, 2024

@BiocondaBot please add label

@BiocondaBot BiocondaBot added the please review & merge set to ask for merge label Oct 8, 2024
@bgruening bgruening merged commit 46ae62c into master Oct 8, 2024
7 checks passed
@bgruening bgruening deleted the bump/mgnify_pipelines_toolkit branch October 8, 2024 15:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
autobump Automatic Version Update new version please review & merge set to ask for merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants