BIDS 2̶.̶0̶1.0: flex BIDS layout (bids-2-devel/issues/54) #1809
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced May 2, 2024
yarikoptic
changed the title
Aims to provide a solution to - bids-standard/bids-2-devel#54 ### Name rationale: Originally I thought to name it BIDSLayout but that one was/is used as a class in pybids. On one hand it is great because corresponds in "principles". But I thought to avoid confusion at least ATM so to make it easier to find issues/code where such a term is used/mentioned. So for now decided to go with BIDSEntitiesLayout but it would be easy to change to anything we want.
yarikoptic
force-pushed
the
bids-2.0-flex-layout
branch
from
f8856f4
to
79f1e22
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Aims to provide a solution to
Name rationale:
Originally I thought to name it
BIDSLayoutbut that one was/is used as a class in pybids. On one hand it is great because corresponds in "principles". But I thought to avoid confusion at least ATM so to make it easier to find issues/code where such a term is used/mentioned. So for now decided to go withBIDSEntitiesLayoutbut it would be easy to change to anything we want.TODOs
sessionlevel somehow) we could aim for regular master.session(for BIDS 2.0 I thought to mandate it being explicit. @effigies pointed out that fmriprep produced both with and without ses- ATM)."."and `"atlases/" : attn BEP-038: Atlases #1714 folks TODO: add a team)sessionandmodalityfolders, thus getting very close to DANDI BIDS-like setup. Attn @TheChymera who is trying nwb2bids on DANDI dandisets)entitiesin rules/files/common/tables.yaml - will be guided by layoutbidsschematoolsto supportbids-validatorto support